Sputnik (JavaScript conformance test): Difference between revisions
m Remove template per TFD outcome |
Tom.Reding (talk | contribs) m Fix Category:Pages using deprecated image syntax; WP:GenFixes on, using AWB |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Infobox website |
{{Infobox website |
||
| name = Sputnik |
| name = Sputnik |
||
| logo = |
| logo = Sputnik-test-icon.gif |
||
| logo_size = 128px |
|||
| owner = [[Google]] Inc. |
| owner = [[Google]] Inc. |
||
| author = [[Christian Plesner Hansen]], [[Sandholm]] |
| author = [[Christian Plesner Hansen]], [[Sandholm]] |
||
| Line 16: | Line 17: | ||
The test was created in [[Russia]] for testing the conformance of the [[V8 (JavaScript engine)|V8 JavaScript engine]] used in [[Google Chrome]].<ref name="chromiumblog" /> |
The test was created in [[Russia]] for testing the conformance of the [[V8 (JavaScript engine)|V8 JavaScript engine]] used in [[Google Chrome]].<ref name="chromiumblog" /> |
||
As part of phasing out [[Google Labs]], Google has shut down Sputnik. All current Sputnik tests have been incorporated into [[ECMAScript# |
As part of phasing out [[Google Labs]], Google has shut down Sputnik. All current Sputnik tests have been incorporated into [[ECMAScript#Conformance tests|ECMA's Test262]] test suite. |
||
==Browsers that do not pass== |
==Browsers that do not pass== |
||
As example, [[Konqueror]] 4.10.1 still only passes 91.8% of the 11573 tests. |
As example, [[Konqueror]] 4.10.1 still only passes 91.8% of the 11573 tests. |
||
===Desktop browsers=== |
===Desktop browsers=== |
||
| Line 33: | Line 34: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
| [[Internet Explorer]] |
| [[Internet Explorer]] |
||
| [[ |
| [[Internet Explorer 11|Internet Explorer 11.0.9600.17420]] {{-}} {{Sputnik progress|8}}<br> |
||
| [[ |
| [[Internet Explorer 11|Internet Explorer 11.0.9879.0]] {{-}} {{Sputnik progress|3}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| [[Google Chrome]] |
| [[Google Chrome]] |
||
| Line 53: | Line 54: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|} |
|} |
||
===ECMAScript testsuite=== |
===ECMAScript testsuite=== |
||
Google has handed the tests from Sputnik test suite to Ecma International for inclusion in its [http://test262.ecmascript.org/ ECMAScript 262 test suite]. Some Sputnik tests however have been found to have issues and do not conform to ECMAScript 5th edition specification.<ref>[https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18 Bug 18 -several tests assume it's okay to have a FunctionDeclaration in a Statement context]</ref> |
Google has handed the tests from Sputnik test suite to Ecma International for inclusion in its [http://test262.ecmascript.org/ ECMAScript 262 test suite]. Some Sputnik tests however have been found to have issues and do not conform to ECMAScript 5th edition specification.<ref>[https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18 Bug 18 -several tests assume it's okay to have a FunctionDeclaration in a Statement context]</ref> |
||
| Line 68: | Line 70: | ||
| no preview version |
| no preview version |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| [[ |
| [[Safari (web browser)|Safari (iOS 6.0.2)]] |
||
| {{Sputnik progress|30}} |
| {{Sputnik progress|30}} |
||
| no preview version |
| no preview version |
||
| Line 77: | Line 79: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|} |
|} |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
{{Portal|Software Testing}} |
{{Portal|Software Testing}} |
||
Revision as of 21:48, 27 February 2018
| Owner | Google Inc. |
|---|---|
| Commercial | No |
| Registration | No |
Sputnik was a JavaScript conformance test suite. The purpose of the test suite was to determine how well a JavaScript implementation adheres to the ECMA-262 specification, 5th edition, looking only at those features that were also present in the 3rd edition.[1] It contained over 5000 tests that touched all aspects of the JavaScript language.[1][2]
The test was created in Russia for testing the conformance of the V8 JavaScript engine used in Google Chrome.[1]
As part of phasing out Google Labs, Google has shut down Sputnik. All current Sputnik tests have been incorporated into ECMA's Test262 test suite.
Browsers that do not pass
As example, Konqueror 4.10.1 still only passes 91.8% of the 11573 tests.
Desktop browsers
This table may contain original research. (November 2011) |
Scores represent the number of failed tests – a perfect score is 0 (100%).
| Browser name | Score of current release | Score of preview release |
|---|---|---|
| Internet Explorer | Internet Explorer 11.0.9600.17420 8/16436 (99.95%) |
Internet Explorer 11.0.9879.0 3/16436 (99.98%) |
| Google Chrome | Google Chrome 30.0.1599.66 9/16436 (99.95%) |
Google Chrome 32.0.1700.39 10/16436 (99.94%) |
| Safari | Safari 6.0.2 8/16436 (99.95%) |
No preview results available |
| Mozilla Firefox | Firefox 33.1.1 53/16436 (99.68%) |
Firefox 28.0a1 48/16436 (99.71%) |
| Opera | Opera 11.60 (build 1185) 1/16436 (99.99%) |
Opera 12.00 (build 1191) 1/16436 (99.99%) |
ECMAScript testsuite
Google has handed the tests from Sputnik test suite to Ecma International for inclusion in its ECMAScript 262 test suite. Some Sputnik tests however have been found to have issues and do not conform to ECMAScript 5th edition specification.[3]
Mobile browsers
| Browser name | Score of current release | Score of preview release |
|---|---|---|
| Android | 128/16436 (99.22%) |
no preview version |
| Safari (iOS 6.0.2) | 30/16436 (99.82%) |
no preview version |
| Internet Explorer Mobile | Internet Explorer Mobile 7 477/16436 (97.1%) |
Internet Explorer Mobile 9 (SDK emulator) 88/16436 (99.46%) |
See also
References
- 1 2 3 Hansen, Christian Plesner (29 June 2009). "Launching Sputnik into Orbit". The Chromium Blog. Google. Retrieved 8 September 2010.
- ↑ "The winners are: Opera, IE, Firefox, Chrome, Safari; in that order". kristopolous. 11 November 2011. Retrieved 6 December 2011.
- ↑ Bug 18 -several tests assume it's okay to have a FunctionDeclaration in a Statement context