Jump to content

Weierstrass–Enneper parameterization

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In mathematics, the Weierstrass–Enneper parameterization of minimal surfaces is a classical piece of differential geometry.

Alfred Enneper and Karl Weierstrass studied minimal surfaces as far back as 1863.

Weierstrass parameterization facilities fabrication of periodic minimal surfaces

Let f and g be functions on either the entire complex plane or the unit disk, where g is meromorphic and f is analytic, such that wherever g has a pole of order m, f has a zero of order 2m (or equivalently, such that the product fg2 is holomorphic), and let c1,c2,c3 be constants. Then the surface with coordinates (x1,x2,x3) is minimal, where the xk are defined using the real part of a complex integral, as follows: xk(ζ)=Re{∫0ζφk(z)dz}+ck,k=1,2,3φ1=f(1−g2)/2φ2=if(1+g2)/2φ3=fg

The converse is also true: every nonplanar minimal surface defined over a simply connected domain can be given a parametrization of this type.[1]

For example, Enneper's surface has f(z) = 1, g(z) = zm.

Parametric surface of complex variables

[edit]

The Weierstrass-Enneper model defines a minimal surface X (ℝ3) on a complex plane (ℂ). Let ω=u+vi (the complex plane as the uv space), the Jacobian matrix of the surface can be written as a column of complex entries: 𝐉=[(1−g2(ω))f(ω)i(1+g2(ω))f(ω)2g(ω)f(ω)] where f(ω) and g(ω) are holomorphic functions of ω.

The Jacobian 𝐉 represents the two orthogonal tangent vectors of the surface:[2] 𝐗𝐮=[Re⁡𝐉1Re⁡𝐉2Re⁡𝐉3]𝐗𝐯=[−Im⁡𝐉1−Im⁡𝐉2−Im⁡𝐉3]

The surface normal is given by 𝐧̂=𝐗𝐮×𝐗𝐯|𝐗𝐮×𝐗𝐯|=1|g|2+1[2Re⁡g2Im⁡g|g|2−1]

The Jacobian 𝐉 leads to a number of important properties: 𝐗𝐮⋅𝐗𝐯=0, 𝐗𝐮2=Re⁡(𝐉2), 𝐗𝐯2=Im⁡(𝐉2), 𝐗𝐮𝐮+𝐗𝐯𝐯=0. The proofs can be found in Sharma's essay: The Weierstrass representation always gives a minimal surface.[3] The derivatives can be used to construct the first fundamental form matrix: [𝐗𝐮⋅𝐗𝐮𝐗𝐮⋅𝐗𝐯𝐗𝐯⋅𝐗𝐮𝐗𝐯⋅𝐗𝐯]=|f|2(1+|g|2)2[1001],

which is isotropic and reflects the conformal property of the parametrization, and the second fundamental form matrix [𝐗𝐮𝐮⋅𝐧̂𝐗𝐮𝐯⋅𝐧̂𝐗𝐯𝐮⋅𝐧̂𝐗𝐯𝐯⋅𝐧̂]

Finally, a point ωt on the complex plane maps to a point 𝐗 on the minimal surface in ℝ3 by 𝐗=[Re⁡∫ω0ωt𝐉1dωRe⁡∫ω0ωt𝐉2dωRe⁡∫ω0ωt𝐉3dω] where ω0=0 for all minimal surfaces throughout this paper except for Costa's minimal surface where ω0=(1+i)/2.

Embedded minimal surfaces and examples

[edit]

The classical examples of embedded complete minimal surfaces in ℝ3 with finite topology include the plane, the catenoid, the helicoid, and the Costa's minimal surface. Costa's surface involves Weierstrass's elliptic function ℘:[4] g(ω)=A℘′(ω) f(ω)=℘(ω) where A is a constant.[5]

Helicatenoid

[edit]

Choosing the functions f(ω)=e−iαeω/A and g(ω)=e−ω/A, a one parameter family of minimal surfaces is obtained.

φ1=e−iαsinh⁡(ωA) φ2=ie−iαcosh⁡(ωA) φ3=e−iα 𝐗(ω)=Re⁡[e−iαAcosh⁡(ωA)ie−iαAsinh⁡(ωA)e−iαω]=cos⁡(α)[Acosh⁡(Re⁡(ω)A)cos⁡(Im⁡(ω)A)−Acosh⁡(Re⁡(ω)A)sin⁡(Im⁡(ω)A)Re⁡(ω)]+sin⁡(α)[Asinh⁡(Re⁡(ω)A)sin⁡(Im⁡(ω)A)Asinh⁡(Re⁡(ω)A)cos⁡(Im⁡(ω)A)Im⁡(ω)]

Choosing the parameters of the surface as ω=s+i(Aϕ): 𝐗(s,ϕ)=cos⁡(α)[Acosh⁡(sA)cos⁡(ϕ)−Acosh⁡(sA)sin⁡(ϕ)s]+sin⁡(α)[Asinh⁡(sA)sin⁡(ϕ)Asinh⁡(sA)cos⁡(ϕ)Aϕ]

At the extremes, the surface is a catenoid (α=0) or a helicoid (α=π/2). Otherwise, α represents a mixing angle. The resulting surface, with domain chosen to prevent self-intersection, is a catenary rotated around the 𝐗3 axis in a helical fashion.

A catenary that spans periodic points on a helix, subsequently rotated along the helix to produce a minimal surface.
The fundamental domain (C) and the 3D surfaces. The continuous surfaces are made of copies of the fundamental patch (R3)

Lines of curvature

[edit]

One can rewrite each element of second fundamental matrix as a function of f and g, for example 𝐗𝐮𝐮⋅𝐧̂=1|g|2+1[Re⁡((1−g2)f′−2gfg′)Re⁡((1+g2)f′i+2gfg′i)Re⁡(2gf′+2fg′)]⋅[Re⁡(2g)Re⁡(−2gi)Re⁡(|g|2−1)]=−2Re⁡(fg′)

And consequently the second fundamental form matrix can be simplified as [−Re⁡fg′Im⁡fg′Im⁡fg′Re⁡fg′]

Lines of curvature make a quadrangulation of the domain

One of its eigenvectors is fg′‾ which represents the principal direction in the complex domain.[6] Therefore, the two principal directions in the uv space turn out to be ϕ=−12Arg⁡(fg′)±kπ/2

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ↑ Dierkes, U.; Hildebrandt, S.; Küster, A.; Wohlrab, O. (1992). Minimal surfaces. Vol. I. Springer. p. 108. ISBN 3-540-53169-6.
  2. ↑ Andersson, S.; Hyde, S. T.; Larsson, K.; Lidin, S. (1988). "Minimal Surfaces and Structures: From Inorganic and Metal Crystals to Cell Membranes and Biopolymers". Chem. Rev. 88 (1): 221–242. doi:10.1021/cr00083a011.
  3. ↑ Sharma, R. (2012). "The Weierstrass Representation always gives a minimal surface". arXiv:1208.5689 [math.DG].
  4. ↑ Lawden, D. F. (2011). Elliptic Functions and Applications. Applied Mathematical Sciences. Vol. 80. Berlin: Springer. ISBN 978-1-4419-3090-3.
  5. ↑ Abbena, E.; Salamon, S.; Gray, A. (2006). "Minimal Surfaces via Complex Variables". Modern Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces with Mathematica. Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp. 719–766. ISBN 1-58488-448-7.
  6. ↑ Hua, H.; Jia, T. (2018). "Wire cut of double-sided minimal surfaces". The Visual Computer. 34 (6–8): 985–995. doi:10.1007/s00371-018-1548-0. S2CID 13681681.