Jump to content

User:Doug Weller

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User:Dougweller)
User:Doug Weller
User:Doug Weller
User talk:Doug Weller
User talk:Doug Weller
User:Doug Weller/Workshop
User:Doug Weller/Workshop
Special:Prefixindex/User:Doug Weller
Special:Prefixindex/User:Doug Weller
User:Doug Weller/Userboxes
User:Doug Weller/Userboxes
Special:Contributions/Doug Weller
Special:Contributions/Doug Weller
Special:Emailuser/Doug Weller
Special:Emailuser/Doug Weller









IP Rangeblock Calculator IP Range Edit Check Checkusers Oversighters

User:Blablubbs/How to file a good SPI

User:Spicy/SPI admin guide

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requestsEntries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages0
Wikipedians looking for help0
...from administrators1
Requests for unblock111
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests63
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests145
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests6
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests3
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests1651
Requested RD1 redactions0
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations1
Candidates for speedy deletion76
Open sockpuppet investigations86
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog


Reports


User-reported

Candidates for speedy deletionEntries
Attack pages0
Copyright violations1
Hoaxes0
Vandalism0
User requested18
Empty articles0
Nonsense pages1
Spam pages8
LLM pages0
Importance or significance not asserted2
Possibly contested candidates13
Other candidates46
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Usernames for administrator attention


User-reported

Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request addition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Indefinite semi-protection: Since this is a policy, it is subject to vandalism. If you look at its page history, there has been such vandalism before (blanking and other similar nonsense). Codename Noreste /// ⭐️✨ 14:27, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Page hasn't been edited in almost a month and disruption seems to be adequately handled. Daniel Case (talk) 22:04, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has been frequently vandalized. I don't think PC protection is enough, so I'm requesting that it be semi-protected. O.N.R. (talk) 21:02, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruption was three days ago. Daniel Case (talk) 23:13, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: IP user insisting on adding material of dubious relevance and editorial quality VampaVampa (talk) 22:05, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

Declined Can you at least try reaching out to them via the article talk page? Edit summaries are not the best forum for discussion. Daniel Case (talk) 23:15, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:57, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

Indefinite full protection: A couple editors expressed support for protecting this redirect in a recent RFD, as it has been kept at three different RFDs across 15 years and retargeted unilaterally against that consensus a number of times. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 00:19, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Block evasion by User:Dealer07. ~2026-59940-48 (talk) 06:00, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes: Persistent sockpuppetry. Block evasion by User:Dealer07. ~2026-59940-48 (talk) 06:10, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes: Persistent sockpuppetry. Block evasion by User:Dealer07. ~2026-59940-48 (talk) 06:10, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Some users are again and again editing the page with under decision things without any valid citation. S19072000P (talk) 07:14, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Some users repeatedly edit the page with unsubstantiated claims without any valid citations. S19072000P (talk) 07:15, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content by temporary accounts. Material on a “Delhi–Ahmedabad–Mumbai Interoperability Mega Terminal” contradicts the article’s cited history, has no reliable-source coverage, and keeps being restored by temporary accounts after removal per WP:BURDEN and WP:V. The information cannot be found in any external sources either. Content is also possibly AI generated. See Talk:Delhi–Ahmedabad high-speed rail corridor. Shashwatpnsk (talk) 07:50, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

The vandaliser appears to have created yet another temporary account to restore previously removed, unsourced content and undo cleanup efforts. Urgent page protection is needed to prevent further disruption, as editors cannot be expected to engage in an endless cycle of reverts. Shashwatpnsk (talk) 18:55, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Danners430 tweaks made 07:54, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 14:34, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. dualcerbtalk 14:42, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. CutlassCiera 14:57, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BlueStaticHorse (talk🌸) 17:05, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Create protection: No need for a draft to ever have this title, make this sysop-protected to create. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 17:35, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. -- Wesoree (talk·contribs) 17:36, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Indefinite create protection: Offensive name – No need to ever exist, implausible redirect. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 17:40, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated edits by an anonymous editor that has engaged in personal attacks. Anon claims "hetero-bias"/"gooner-bias" in persistent edits to the lead. Attempts to discuss have shown unwillingness to compromise, even when pointed out their edits are adding WP:WEASEL words to the lead that alter its coverage. Kung Fu Man (talk) 18:06, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Alraunenstern very rarely, if ever goes on enwiki (he`s a German Wikipedia admin), recent history full of egregious cross-wiki attacks (such as one which directly translates to "you`re a dick" in German) by TAs after not being edited in a half-decade. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 18:11, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Will say @Alraunenstern has thanked me for this edit so they certainly support protection. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 20:28, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
Yes, thank you very much for your efforts. On the German Wikipedia, I blocked the user behind these temporary accounts twice due to vandalism; following this, the user became abusive here on my talk page. I would appreciate it if the page could be protected. I have also noticed that the user is extending their activities to the user talk page of User:Itti. In my view, it would be sensible to keep an eye on her page or to protect it as well. --Alraunenstern (talk) 20:39, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
Actually, there's another way to deal with this. There's a remarkably small, stable range all these TA have come from, so IP address(es) partially blocked (from User talk:Alraunenstern; User talk:Itti). for three years. The Bushranger One ping only 22:20, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/BMX target for over 8 years, and has had a 3 year protection and a 1 year protection. Enough is enough. dualcerbtalk 19:39, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After page protection ended, the history is almost entirely unregistered vandalism being reverted. Semi-protection seemed sufficient, but perhaps indefinite now. 2pou (talk) 19:51, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Reporting this again after another sock edited the article. dualcerbtalk 20:12, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:27, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Reason: High amounts of vandalism (the redirect page) NRP (talk) 21:09, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Youtuber zealand is playing the game football manager and using this team. This seems to result in some viewers vandalizing the page adding him as manager etc.

Similar ting happened to the UD Melilla in the past Øln (talk) 21:15, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

  • Temporary Pending changes protection until zealand is done playing with this football club is likely sufficient Øln (talk) 21:24, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Protection expired in September after 3 months, and it is now clear this needs more protection. 6 Months to 1 Year of Semi-Protection. I wouldn't oppose indefinite semi-protection either. Servite et contribuere (talk) 22:40, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Otisu(talk) 23:10, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:14, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated anonymous account insertion of unsourced material (changing "baritone" to "bass" in the voice line) Deveroonie (talk) 23:45, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is a current event receiving a lot of coverage and is being updated frequently. It is being targeted for vandalism and hate speech repeatedly in a short period. S1mply.dogmom (talk) 23:48, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content/content not in cited source. Waxworker (talk) 00:37, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Several users, including @Nov132026 have been adding fake release dates. The Media Expert (talk) 01:03, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. -- Wesoree (talk·contribs) 01:07, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/IMH & WP:CT/CASTE. Persistent ECR violations. Zalaraz (talk) 01:57, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Temporary semi-protect it due to vandalism by a temporary account and two users. Thomasfan1916[built buses?] 02:19, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request removal of protection from a page, or reducing the current protection level

Temporary pending changes protection: Testing whether long-term protection is still needed. There isn’t too much vandalism, maybe try PCP? Bennett Li11 (Talk to Me) 00:29, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Not done There likely isn't vandalism because of the protection. And it was only protected earlier today, and the scandal is very much in the news right now. (Not to mention I imagine you didn't check with the protecting admin as instructions on this page require.) – Muboshgu (talk) 01:12, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit be made to a protected page


Please update the worldwide gross collection of Ramayana: Part One (2026) to ₹1033.55 crore.

Source: https://www.sacnilk.com/quicknews/ramayana_part_1_2026_Box_Office_Collection_Day_8

The source reports an India gross of ₹675.05 crore and an overseas gross of ₹358.50 crore, bringing the worldwide gross to ₹1033.55 crore. Chandreshkhare34 (talk) 18:36, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

4 protected edit requests
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Module:Message box/ambox.css (request) 2026-11-12 05:01 Cascade-protected from Main Page (log) Modified by KrakatoaKatie on 2016-11-16: "restore"
Module:Message box/tmbox.css (request) 2026-11-12 05:01 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
MediaWiki:Watchlist-messages (request) 2026-11-13 01:28 MediaWiki page (log) Unprotected by Cyberpower678 on 2018-11-20: "Breaks the RfX bot."
Module:Mainspace editnotice (request) 2026-11-13 02:47 Fully protected (log) Protected by Pppery on 2024-02-09: "High-risk template or module"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:35, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
6 template-protected edit requests
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox football biography (request) 2026-09-23 18:48 Template-protected (log) Protected by Mike V on 2014-03-01: "Highly visible page: restoring protection"
Template:Infobox military installation (request) 2026-10-11 21:22 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Infobox AFL biography (request) 2026-10-28 23:07 Template-protected (log) Modified by Samsara on 2017-01-14: "Highly visible template: via RfPP (almost 13k transclusions now)"
Template:Cite certification (request) 2026-11-12 23:28 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2020-08-29: "High-risk template"
Template:Gallery (request) 2026-11-13 18:08 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox airport (request) 2026-11-13 22:32 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:36, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

WP:RFA

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

I have been editing since May last year and have created more than 25 articles. Two of them are rated B‑class, and most of the others are C‑class or Start‑class. Two of my articles, Presley Gerber and Killing of Sonia Exelby, were nominated for deletion because of differing views on their notability, but both were kept. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ItsShandog (talk • contribs) 11:59, 22 October 2026 (UTC)

Hi @ItsShandog, could you explain how you created Brendan MegrawBrendan Megraw in Diff/1290863082? Why did you use the {{navbox}} template in Diff/1290872406 and how did you produce that in such a short amount of time? Why did you remove the {{ai-generated}} tag (added in Diff/1348062842), along with utm_source=chatgpt.com parameters, in Diff/1348070103 and then restore the original redirect in Diff/1379884757 a couple of months later? ‑‑gurkubondinn 14:59, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
That would have been around the time I was new to Wikipedia from what I can recall, and looking at it now, it was days after I joined when I would have used ChatGPT. That was before I knew much about AI or about Wikipedia. I stopped using it a long time ago, as I saw how unreliable it was even before the ban on Wikipedia. I cannot explain the navbox, as I have no idea what that is. I would assume it was something to do with ChatGPT at that time. In regard to restoring it to a redirect, that was more to do with the fact that I was editing the disappeared page that covers all those people, and the page more or less repeats the same thing. It does not have any more information than the disappeared page. It was not anything to do with my old edits, as I did not even notice the ChatGPT bit on it. I forgot about that edit, as it was over a year ago. If I had remembered, I would have gone back and fixed all of that, but it is better as a redirect anyway. ItsShandog (talk) 15:17, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
The reason for the removal of the AI part was that this was at the point when I did not use it anymore, but I had not fixed the page at that stage, so I should not have removed it. That was my own fault. There were so many pages I would have edited when I was new that I could not remember them all, but any I come across now I try to fix. I probably removed the ChatGPT part because I would have assumed that was what the template was referring to. That would have been me trying to fix the page, but to be honest I did not know the ins and outs of AI until recently, or all the different ways it is incorrect. Even back in April I just assumed a page was tagged with that because it had old links from ChatGPT and that type of thing. It is only when I have started to read the AI signs page on Wikipedia that I have learned about all the different things it does. If I had known that in April, I would have done a lot of copyediting and fixing of that page. ItsShandog (talk) 15:21, 24 October 2026 (UTC)

I am requesting the autopatrolled permission for my account.

My account was created in January 2019, and I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia since then, with over 14,900 edits to date. I have created more than 38 articles, along with numerous redirects in the mainspace. Most of my articles have successfully passed New Page Patrol without any significant issues.

My contributions primarily focus on Indian cinema and biographical topics, particularly under WikiProject India. I have consistently tried to follow Wikipedia's content policies and article creation guidelines while creating and improving articles.

Given my editing history and experience with article creation, I believe I have demonstrated a good understanding of Wikipedia's standards. I would appreciate it if my account could be considered for the autopatrolled permission, as it would help reduce the workload for New Page Patrol volunteers. Needforname (talk) 15:48, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for applying, @Needforname. Did you use an LLM-based tool to write the request above or this post at RSN? Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:08, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
Thanks for asking, @Dclemens1971. I used an LLM to polish the my autopatrolled request, but editing history, article creation and other details mentioned are my own. The request reflects my actual contributions and intentions. Needforname (talk) 16:21, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
I think you used the LLM to do more than "polish" your request. The English fluency is significantly different than what you have previously produced. Many of your most recent plot summaries do not use understandable English. Examples: Bholi contest for election by with support of water mafia. Hunny hatch plan made Choocha to contest opposite Bholi and because of Choocha innocence get massive support of folks. Bholi made plan and Fukras to South Africa for Choocha's deja-chu but they got another gift (Fukrey (film series)); Shiva is getting arranged married with Vidhya. During reception, night before the marriage ceremony, Anu arrived and secretly proposed Shiva on stage. Anu and Shiva are working together for last 5 years, Anu continuously Shiva's proposal and now she is asking to marry her. Vidhya has big dream's with Shiva. Now Shiva in dilemma, who to marry. Same night, in same place, others also various dilemma, about their love. (Shubhamangala (2022 film)).
Doing a scan through your recent creations, I also see Dr. Arora's plot summary is cut off mid-sentence, and the episode list is uncited. Finally, as is common with LLM-generated prose, your request doesn't demonstrate understanding of the purpose of autopatrolled. You haven't created an article in more than two years, so autopatrolled would not be of value to reducing the backlog of new pages. And we cannot have an editor who is using LLMs in this way editing without patroller scrutiny.  Not done. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:31, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
This user has created more than 2,000 articles and it would save partollers time by not having to review articles by this user. In solidarity, Dafootballguy (Want to talk?) 19:22, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

I would like to have access in order to perform batch updates of outdated locator maps. Excommunicato (talk) 19:51, 10 November 2026 (UTC)
Requests for confirmation

Confirmed

New alt of @ExplorerofUniverse for a fresh start. Larawag (talk) 22:22, 10 November 2026 (UTC)

This is my alt. ExplorerofUniverse✦ (talk) 22:24, 10 November 2026 (UTC)
 Not done: clean start accounts should not be associated with previous ones. @ExplorerofUniverse & @Larawag: please declare your connection publicly on your userpage, as you've declared here. If you are looking for an actual fresh start account, please carefully read the page I've linked. Best, Staraction (talk · contribs) 00:33, 11 November 2026 (UTC)
Can it just be a normal non fresh start account? ExplorerofUniverse✦ (talk) 00:37, 11 November 2026 (UTC)
Nevermind ExplorerofUniverse✦ (talk) 02:19, 11 November 2026 (UTC)

I have met the required editing and account age requirements, though my account does not appear to have been automatically confirmed; could you please review my status and enable the appropriate editing rights? Thank you. WYGYA (talk) 17:49, 11 November 2026 (UTC)

Already done (automated response): This user already has the "autoconfirmed" user right. — MusikBot talk 17:50, 11 November 2026 (UTC)

Reason for requesting confirmed rights to edit few pages Sarseninna20012001 (talk) 08:04, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

 Not done – Hi, and thank you for creating an account to edit Wikipedia. Although I fully understand your desire to dive right in, many of our articles are semi-protected because they are controversial, prone to vandalism, or other reasons. As a new editor with few edits, it might be wise to discuss your edits on the article talkpage in order to gain consensus for your edits, and then use {{Edit semi-protected}} to request the edit be performed. I only recommend this until you are used to the challenges of reliable sources, the biographies of living persons policy, and other similar policies. The good news is that fewer than 5 percent of Wikipedia articles are protected; this means that more than 95 percent of the articles can use your help right now! stwalkerster (talk) 13:04, 12 November 2026 (UTC)
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

Hello, Fellow Wikipedians!

After User:Strongshorts suggested that I request for Extended Confirmed permissions, I decided to request again after my previous request was declined!

Again, I have familiarised myself with WP:GAME as well as WP:EXTENDEDCONFIRMED.

I will promise not to game the system ever again.

Happy editing and best wishes, Zahrazamedahmedi 💬My Talk Page💬 🫗My Mistakes🫗 05:12, 8 November 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for extended confirmed declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot talk 05:20, 8 November 2026 (UTC)

New alt of @ExplorerofUniverse for a fresh start. Larawag (talk) 22:23, 10 November 2026 (UTC)

This is my alt. ExplorerofUniverse✦ (talk) 22:24, 10 November 2026 (UTC)
 Not done: clean start accounts should not be associated with previous ones. @ExplorerofUniverse & @Larawag: please declare your connection publicly on your userpage, as you've declared here. If you are looking for an actual fresh start account, please carefully read the page I've linked. Best, Staraction (talk · contribs) 00:33, 11 November 2026 (UTC)
Can it just be a normal non-fresh start account or no? ExplorerofUniverse✦ (talk) 00:37, 11 November 2026 (UTC)
Nevermind ExplorerofUniverse✦ (talk) 02:19, 11 November 2026 (UTC)

Could I have my extended-confirmed status restored? It's been more than 30 days, and I've put in more than 500 major edits.

I lost my status because I gamed the system by inserting wikilinks to increase my edit count. Nearly a year ago, I thought this would be a good way to avoid violating protections put on pages related to WP:PIA. I had not read all the rules surrounding protected topics, and I learned, notice by notice, how much I had to steer clear of those topics.

I think I have had a clean record since having my status revoked. Though I've gotten into some extended discussions on talk pages, my edits by and large have not been reverted nor my editing style labelled as disruptive.

I was going to wait until the one year anniversary of my status being revoked, but I was just pinged in a discussion on a page I can't edit. It was also by an editor I've historically disagreed with, which I take to be a good sign that I haven't ruffled too many feathers on Wikipedia.

Thanks for your consideration! Dauntbares (talk) 16:24, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

I like to request extended confirmed rights. Thank you. Liamgabby4319 (talk) 16:26, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

 Not done – Please read your own talk page for the explanation. WP:GAMING the user rights system won't help you. Favonian (talk) 16:35, 12 November 2026 (UTC)
Requests for event coordinator

Event coordinator

Hi! Please could I have event coordinator rights? As part of my role with Wikimedia UK I run editing events so being able to handle the 6 user IP block would be handy.

This is my work account. (My volunteer account is User:GwiwerNiwlog). My edits are split across cy.wiki, en.wiki, commons and Meta.

If I'm not eligible for a long term award then the two upcoming events I have are on 10th December 2026 and 19th January 2027. Thanks! Gemma Coleman (WMUK) (talk) 12:02, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

 Done until January 23. —⁠TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 17:40, 12 November 2026 (UTC)
Requests for file mover

File mover

Reason for requesting file mover rights is to fix minor mistakes made when uploading. I upload many files pertaining to history and astronomy, and sometimes make a mistake in the title I do not notice until the file is uploaded (for example; wrong date, typo). It simplifies the process of fixing said errors if I can do it myself. Minnastronomer (talk) 04:36, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
Requests for mass message sender

Mass message sender

I'm one of the organizers of the WP:LATINOS WikiProject, and I sometimes host events where I need to invite people to join. I expect to use this about six or seven times a year, to message WikiProject members and editors who work on articles about Latinos in the US. I already know how the tool works, since I have these rights on the Spanish Wikipedia and Meta-Wiki. Oscar_. (talk) 17:50, 11 November 2026 (UTC)

 Done —⁠TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 22:02, 11 November 2026 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

I would like to help reduce the backlog of unreviewed new pages. I have experience participating in XFD, AfC reviewing, and creating/expanding articles, including promoting 1 good article. I believe that I meet the general criteria for NPR. EvanTech10 (talk, contribs) ⚡ 01:24, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

 Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. signed, Rosguill talk 16:43, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Previously had the rights which were revoked for inactivity. Would like to help with the backlog, particularly reviewing new redirects. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 21:40, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

 Done, welcome back. signed, Rosguill talk 16:44, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

Previously had page mover rights which expired due to inactivity. Would like them again to carry out technical requests and close page moves. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 20:49, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

Reason: I actively maintain and standardize article titles across international sports, tournament documentation, and New Page Patrol, and I regularly hit technical limitations that require waiting on WP:RM/TR or tagging redirects for speedy deletion. Specifically, I need the Page mover right to:

Revert unexplained or undiscussed moves where the original title is blocked by a redirect (using round-robin swaps).

Suppress (R2) cross-namespace redirects directly when draftifying premature mainspace articles, rather than having to tag every leftover redirect with {{db-r2}}.

Suppress implausible typo/formatting redirects (R3) when correcting capitalization, diacritics, or naming convention errors (WP:COMMONNAME / WP:CONCISE).

Clean up cut-and-paste moves and move multi-part templates or tournament pages together with their subpages (/doc, /sandbox, sub-events).

I understand WP:R#DELETE and will preserve redirects whenever a title is a plausible search term, former name, or has incoming links. Ravana TALK 09:24, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for page mover declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot talk 09:30, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

Hello,

I am requesting this because I want to expand my reviewing and anti-vandalism toolset and have more opportunities to do anti-vandalism work. While I am relatively new, I have experience, as you can see on the Simple English Wikipedia. I understand vandalism, BLP, and copyright policies, and I have read the review guidelines. Again, while I am relatively new, I think this would help me achieve my anti-vandalism goal, and I hope you can at least suggest how to get this permission.

Thank you, ExplorerofUniverse ExplorerofUniverse (talk) 03:09, 7 November 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 80 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 03:10, 7 November 2026 (UTC)
This has changed, and I have prior experience. ExplorerofUniverse (talk) 06:48, 7 November 2026 (UTC)
Yeah, I can see by your extended confirmed status. You have 111 mainspace edits as of this comment. ;D ☯️🐉🐼 Unsurprising 🐼🐉☯️: nice to meet you! 📝 👥 15:19, 7 November 2026 (UTC)
Thank you! ExplorerofUniverse (talk) 16:39, 7 November 2026 (UTC)
My pleasure! ;D ☯️🐉🐼 Unsurprising 🐼🐉☯️: nice to meet you! 📝 👥 17:28, 7 November 2026 (UTC)
icon Request withdrawn ExplorerofUniverse✦ (talk) 03:30, 11 November 2026 (UTC)

I would like to help clear the pending changes backlog from time to time. I meet all of the requirements and I have read the guideline on reviewing. a wondrous raven (talk) 05:30, 10 November 2026 (UTC)

 Done DanCherek (talk) 04:28, 11 November 2026 (UTC)
I wish to get more involved in helping Wikipedia. I meet the criteria, have reviewed applicable guidelines and policies and understand (through reading and some experience) the basic principles governing Wikipedia (WP:NOR, WP:BLP, WP:NPOV,WP:VERIF) and the fundamental WP:!. I am very keen to improve Wikipedia in any way I can. Quince&Medlar (talk) 11:10, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

Hello! I submitted a request for this right not too long ago, It was denied because I didn't yet have enough experience, But, I have largely improved over time and have almost 700 edits and a large track record of removing vandalism. I'm requesting this right because I'm wanting access to AntiVandal and just better tools in general. I also have a very good track record for notifying editors when reverting their edits. I have no history of edit warring. And I believe I meet all requirements to be given this permission. Thank You, 208𝑦𝒆𝑎𝒉ℎ (talk) 01:12, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot talk 01:20, 12 November 2026 (UTC)
I am requesting rollback rights for access to anti-vandalism tools such as CVPI and AbuseReview. I have plenty of experience patrolling RTRC, patrolling Special:AbuseLog, and warning editors after reverting their edits. Szxq (talk) 22:18, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
Requests for temporary account IP viewer

Temporary account IP viewer

I work in counter-vandalism, Articles for Creation, and, more recently, the AI noticeboard. I belive that TAIV permissions are required because in Articles for Creation and AI cleanup, it would be useful to see if TAs are block evading or have used LLMs in the past (for cleanup reasons and for linking cleanup cases at the AINB). For counter-vandalism, it would be useful simply for reporting socks and confirming if possibly connected TAs are connected. BlueStaticHorse (talk🌸) 15:04, 11 November 2026 (UTC)

 Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:09, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Been working on counter-vandalism for 2-ish months now, and recently AfC and NPP. While admittedly I won't use this permission a whole lot, it would be useful to save time filing an SPI occasionally :3 pattersonuwu njz (talk) 22:15, 11 November 2026 (UTC)

 Done Staraction (talk · contribs) 08:33, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

I would like to be a temporary account IP viewer. As you can see from my recent edit history, I have been involved in counter-vandalism, and I have initiated sockpuppet investigations. IGAEB (talk) 01:24, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

It has been suggested to me that I request this right in order to save time on filing SPIs since I've been involved in many SPIs now (usually with the same users using different socks). Raskuly 🐰 14:49, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

 Done Fathoms Below (talk) 18:22, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

.

Template:Centralized discussion – Current discussions
Expired PRODs (2)
Candidates for speedy deletionEntries
User requested18
Empty articles0
Nonsense pages1
Spam pages8
Importance or significance not asserted2
Other candidates47
RfA candidateSONS%Ending (UTC)Time leftDups?Report
RfB candidateSONS%Ending (UTC)Time leftDups?Report

No RfXs since 22:30, 13 November 2026 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

Barnstars

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
For adhereing to Wikipedia policies, professionalism, providing answers when needed, and for your help even though we do not agree on every detail. Thank you!
Dr. Persi (talk) 05:09, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
for consistently prompt action against miscreants. The Gnome (talk) 11:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence
I award you this barnstar in recognition of a combination of extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service for Wikipedia's Caucasus related topics.--Yacatisma (talk) 16:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)