User talk:MSGJ

The redirect Film Grain Modeling has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 27 § Film Grain Modeling until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 04:00, 27 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi MSGJ,

I notice you removed the LLMPROD tag from this article and indicated you'd take responsibility for this. It's great to see articles salvaged, but the current version of the article still has strong signs of LLM text. These include WP:AIATTR and a general tendency to tell us that sources covered something, rather than what they said; WP:AIBOLD; and WP:AIDISCLAIMER (The early history and identity of the individual Mullion workings are not completely clear. Flett and Hill stated that they could not establish whether Wheal Unity was the oldest mine in the district.

I checked the first reference (Schmitz) and it does not mention the words "Wheal" or "Unity" so it's hard to see how it could support the claims.

Later mining historian A. K. Hamilton Jenkin devoted several pages to the Mullion mines, is not cited, which is odd for something attributed to a specific author.

I strongly recommend you draftify or userfy this and give it a thorough rewrite, or else restore the LLMPROD tag. It's not ready for mainspace in its current form. M kuhner (talk) 13:35, 3 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Okay this is good call, and looking into this further it seems I should not have intervened. I think I will just let the LLMPROD run its cause instead of moving it somewhere else — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:24, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I noticed that you deleted Template:Vital article in 2024 as a result of the migration to the new vital article talk header template. Instead of deleting it, could you mark it as historical instead (and move it to a subpage of Wikipedia:Vital articles if needed)? Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 May 17#Template:Vital article was a merge discussion, not a deletion discussion.

The reason I'm requesting this is that there is one particular edit to that template that is, in my opinion, rather significant to VA history: the decision to use File:Círculos Concéntricos.svg as the icon for VA. I believe it was an edit by Melody Lavender back in 2014. As of right now, any enterprising VA historian who is not an admin will not be able to determine how this icon was chosen. Thanks, Malerisch (talk) 16:30, 13 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

MSGJ pinging in case you missed this. Malerisch (talk) 18:01, 21 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I forgot about this. Yes I will move it to a subpage in project space. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:37, 21 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

It's at Wikipedia:Vital articles/template. I need to figure out what's causing that error message — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:50, 22 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Looks good, thanks for undeleting it! Malerisch (talk) 09:04, 22 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Maybe you could some kind of banner at the top to explain why it has been kept? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:04, 22 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

A {{Historical}} template has been added; someone else can add more detail if they want. Malerisch (talk) 19:34, 22 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I initiated a proposal for introducing CTBUH as one of the geographic sections of the Authority control template. One of the admins have supported the idea. Could you please throw an eye on the talk page thread too? Cheers! JeyReydar97 (talk) 09:42, 2 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

Should we continue with adding the ID then? JeyReydar97 (talk) 15:54, 8 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

I think that we should try to unprotect Cimorelli. It's been protected for 14 years and doesn't seem to be an immediate target for disruption at this time. Theeverywhereperson talk here ^{In solidarity!} 10:40, 7 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good idea!  Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:15, 9 November 2026 (UTC)Reply