Jump to content

User talk: Vanderwaalforces

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:VWF bot)
Latest comment: 2 days ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 21

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Vanderwaalforces. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 23 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ewuare scheduled for TFA

[edit]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for October 16, 2026. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 2026, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/October 2026. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Z1720 (talk) 20:02, 26 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Z1720 Interesting blurb... why is the Oba not italicised and literally translated as in the article? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:57, 26 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • Oda isn't italicised in Oba of Benin, so I assumed it was a term that has been adopted into the English language and thus wouldn't be italicised (like kimono). It can be italicised if there is a good reason for it. As for the translation, it was taken out because there was a wikilink to the term and blurbs have to be under 1,025 characters, so I made an editorial decision to remove it (among lots of other information). It looks like it can be added back in without going over the 1,025 character limit. Feel free to edit the blurb as you see fit. Z1720 (talk) 21:12, 26 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Because of the LLM concerns and the mainspace block, this article has been swapped out from TFA for tomorrow. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:53, 15 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Vanderwaalforces. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 30 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

VWF bot didn't add an RfD log page

[edit]

Looks like the bot failed to add the new RfD log page for several hours; I had to add it manually. Not entirely sure what is going on here - my guess is that I ended up creating it (instead of the bot) because I nominated something in the window between the rollover of the new day and the bot making the page, and then the bot didn't notice that it needed to transclude it on the main page?

Also, while I'm here - there's been at least two cases recently (I can find the diffs if you're curious but I don't have them easily to hand) where someone closed the last open nomination on a page, the bot removed that transculsion from the main page, and then the closer changed their mind an hour or later and reopened it, orphaning that page. Any chance the bot could check, say, the last week's worth of closed log pages for any still-open pages to guard against this genre of problem? Not sure how difficult it would be to build this in.

Thanks for running the bot, by the way, I know I just came here to complain but it's so much nicer not to have to think about removing old log pages manually. Rusalkii (talk) 04:17, 6 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Rusalkii Thank you. I restarted the bot and it worked as it should today. For the other case where people close and decide to change their mind, Jay first asked that the bot's removal time be delayed, but I knew within me that that might not even fix the problem. I will looking into doing something like a check but not now because of the whole situation I have IRL right now. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:07, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, of course, it's not frequent enough to be a big deal. Rusalkii (talk) 18:52, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Vanderwaalforces: VWF bot failed to add the Sept 12 RfD log page today as well Duckmather (talk) 23:18, 12 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Duckmather Thanks for notifying me; this looks like a Toolforge automation issue as opposed to a problem with my program, so I’ll continue to keep an eye. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:47, 13 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
It happened again on Oct 13. Duckmather (talk) 16:46, 16 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Ahenzae

[edit]

On 12 September 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ahenzae, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that, according to tradition, King Ahenzae lost the Kingdom of Benin's royal coral beads to a palace priest through repeated games of dice? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ahenzae. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Ahenzae), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Launchballer 00:03, 12 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Promotion of Idia

[edit]
Congratulations, Vanderwaalforces! The article you nominated, Idia, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, FrB.TG (talk) via FACBot (talk) 11:06, 13 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Idia's FA status

[edit]

Congratulations on Idia making it to FA status. It was quite long, but we'll take it as long as it's detailed. I did take a look at Ohuan, and will take another look when I have time.

I hope you've had a fine weekend so far. Best, MSincccc (talk) 12:29, 13 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

@MSincccc And Idia would not achieve that without your always helpful comments and suggestions. Thank you so much and I look forward to your feedback re Ohuan.
My weekend was indeed fine, I hope yours was too? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:27, 13 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Preparing for tomorrow. And then to sneak out time after lessons and classes for FAC, my Wiki projects and other stuff.
Good luck with the Ohuan FAC. MSincccc (talk) 15:42, 13 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
story · music · places
Congratulations! And a woman ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:32, 13 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
I have two topics in today's OTD corner - check out story and music, I decided for Verdi (the conductor who said "I love all of Verdi" and conducted by heart) over Bach because that cantata sits on sort of the wrong date ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:31, 22 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Bach composed a cantata for today's feast, performed 300 years ago. This time the main page has it on the right date. I nominated it for GA ;) - Also waiting for a review: Maureen Jones (on WP:ITNN), - someone said the article isn't good enough for the main page. We could change that! Already arrived there: Bryan Kelly and his fun Magnificat. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:43, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

OK, so not templated but AI concerns on some recent edits - see ANI.

[edit]

I haven't looked into this, so I'm merely the messenger at this stage with no view on this. But to let you know that you are being discussed on the AI Noticeboard, where any comments you have would be most welcome. ChrysGalley (talk) 18:06, 13 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Guild of Copy Editors – September 2026 Newsletter

[edit]
Guild of Copy Editors – September 2026 Newsletter

Hello, and welcome to the September newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since June.

Election news: Project coordinators play an important role in our WikiProject. Following the mid-year Election of Coordinators, we welcomed TNM101 to the coordinator team. Dhtwiki remains as lead coordinator, and Miniapolis, Mox Eden and GoldRomean return as coordinators. We said goodbye to Wikieditor662 and thank them for their service. If you'd like to help out behind the scenes, please consider taking part in our December election – watchlist our ombox for updates. Information about the role of coordinators can be found here.

Reviewing system: The Guild is adopting a new system of scoring copy edit reviews. A point will be given for each review, and barnstars for reviewing will be awarded. These changes will take effect from this month's drive, and we encourage experienced copy editors to sign up for reviewing. For more details, see here.

June 2026 blitz: 18 of the 20 editors who signed up for the June 2026 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited a total of 69,606 words comprising 30 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

July 2026 drive: 30 of the 44 editors who signed up for the July 2026 Backlog Elimination Drive copy edited a total of 531,346 words comprising 252 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

August 2026 Blitz: 13 of the 16 editors who signed up for the August 2026 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited a total of 192,712 words comprising 64 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

September 2026 Drive: Sign up here to earn barnstars in our month-long, in-progress September Backlog Elimination Drive.

Progress report: As of 23:47, 13 September 2026 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 207 requests since 1 January, and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 1,511 articles.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we do without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 13 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Vanderwaalforces. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:01, 14 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 17

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:53, 16 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Four Award

[edit]

Four Award
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Ogbebo. —⁠TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 16:31, 20 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 76

[edit]
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 76, July–August 2026
  • New partnership: The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • New Partnership Manager joins the team
  • Spotlight: TWL page on Meta
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 11:45, 23 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

(This message was sent to User:Vanderwaalforces and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

GA circle

[edit]

Hello! I noticed that you have signed up for WP:GACIRCLE. I am also interested in this, with the article Otvet. The article is mostly finished in my opinion, sources are exhausted, copyediting has been performed, etc. So, I think that it is ready for GAN. However, Donner60 has said that he will look over the page (as he was the one who gave it that B-class rating) and I want to wait for him to see if I need any major reworks. Even though I cannot submit the article currently, I hope that we can form a nice circle and confirm spots. I am happy to review any article, preferably the Croatian Bloc (coalition) one, but honestly, the shorter the article, the better, as I do not have a lot of time. I will not be able to review all of next week, and maybe next weekend I can try, but time is not in abundance. I will crosspost this to both other users who have signed up for the circle. What do you think? NotRealShady7 7 7 (customer service) 21:48, 25 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

just realized I don't meet the criteria for GARC, well, its too bad I guess. NotRealShady7 7 7 (customer service) 01:24, 26 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Thefakeslimshady777 Oh no, I’d encourage you to keep contributing; I’ll be more than happy to collaborate with you in a circle someday. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 06:18, 26 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
yea I'm getting a GA mentor now, that should do it, we might get that circle going NotRealShady7 7 7 (customer service) 15:31, 26 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

October 2026 Administrator Elections – Schedule

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:46, 26 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

October 2026 Administrator Elections – Call for Candidates

[edit]

The administrator elections process has officially started! Qualified editors are encouraged to find at least one experienced nominator. Self-nominations are also allowed. Please review instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2026/Candidates.

Here is the schedule:

  • September 29 – October 5: Nominations phase (we are here)
  • October 8–12: Discussion phase
  • October 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

  • The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed. However, in practice, few candidates succeed without ~10K edits, some content creation, no recent behavioral issues, and a nominator.
  • Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for admin elections candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
  • The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
  • The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
  • Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 18

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:50, 30 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ohen scheduled for TFA

[edit]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for November 14, 2026. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 2026, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/November 2026. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be left there. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Z1720 (talk) 02:14, 30 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

TFA!

[edit]
story · music · places

Thank you today for Independence Day (Nigeria), introduced: "Independence Day is an annual public holiday in Nigeria observed on 1 October to mark the country's independence from the United Kingdom in 1960. It is observed nationwide with official ceremonies, military parades, cultural displays, and public events. The holiday's origins are linked to Nigeria's constitutional developments under British colonial administration."! Enjoy your first TFA day! Two more scheduled, that's amazing! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:38, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Gerda Arendt I cannot thank you enough for your kindness. You have a special place in my heart. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:59, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Blushing: you just thanked me much more than enough! - What do you think about becoming a member of WP:QAI, also known as the cabal of the outcast (discouraged ...). It takes a signature, and virtual flowers are the reward. (You are already a member by what you do.) - I'm just updating an article, John Bröcheler, and then will turn to your FAC, promised. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:06, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oh, I didn’t know it’s something I could sign up for: done! Looking forward to your ever helpful feedback ;) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:12, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Precious anniversary

[edit]
Precious
One year!

Nice coincidence? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:44, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

It’s one year already? Wow! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:58, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
welcome to QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:19, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
My story is about a plea for peace premiered 90 years ago. It was already my story in 2023. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:11, 2 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Women: today Irene Butter (don't miss the short video in her story and article), yesterday Tabea Zimmermann for her 60th (I was in the audience for that concert in 2023, long video), and some day Ileana Cotrubaș again, whose article became GA today. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:09, 9 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

WP:GARC: Invitation to review Blade (Honkai)

[edit]

Hello, you have been paired at good article review circles to review Blade (Honkai). At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#138.

In solidarity, Gommeh (talk 🎮 sign) 19:44, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of Ozolua is under review

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Ozolua is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jishara -- Jishara (talk) 11:28, 2 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

DCWC awards!!!

[edit]

Hey VWF, after a discussion among the DCWC coordinators about the evidence presented at this AI noticeboard section, we've regretfully decided to disqualify you from this year's contest. Your awards are retracted, and I've struck them above. Please let me know if you have any questions. —⁠TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 05:13, 21 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Retirement

[edit]

I am retiring from Wikipedia. Wikipedia was built on the philosophy of curiosity leading to discovery. I believe this is why I was attracted in the first place. I'm stepping back while I still remember what the curiosity felt like. Thank you for your contributions! All messages on my talk page are welcome. CostalCal (talk) 02:54, 3 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of Ozolua is on hold

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Ozolua has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jishara -- Jishara (talk) 03:47, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of Ozolua has passed

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Ozolua has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jishara -- Jishara (talk) 18:08, 6 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

October 2026 Administrator Elections – Discussion Phase

[edit]

The discussion phase of the October 2026 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 8–12: Discussion phase (we are here)
  • October 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase
  • Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2026/Discussion phase.

On 13 Oct, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for.

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 8 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

New cross-language page link: Benin Altar Tusk

[edit]

A new page Benin Altar Tusk on the Hausa Wikipedia has been linked to the page Benin Altar Tusk, which you created, via Wikidata (Q122930070).

You will not be notified about future links to pages you created. To opt in to these notifications, follow the opt-in instructions.

NervousBot (talk) 06:02, 9 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

AI Cleanup investigation

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:AI noticeboard regarding an AI cleanup investigation which may be related to you. Sorry, I know you know about this but since you were not properly notified I'm doing it now. Dr vulpes (Talk) 00:30, 12 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

October 2026 Administrator Elections – Voting Phase

[edit]

The voting phase of the October 2026 administrator elections has started and will continue until 19 October 2026 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2026/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase (we are here)
  • Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 13 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

September 2026 NPP backlog drive – Points award

[edit]
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar   
This award is given in recognition of Vanderwaalforces for accumulating at least 10 points in the September 2026 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped review 14549 articles and 3163 redirects during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and helping reduce the backlog! Max (talk) 16:27, 13 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 19

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:30, 13 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

October 2026

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for continued use of LLMs based on evidence presented at Wikipedia:AI_noticeboard/Vanderwaalforces to prevent further disruption.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page. Alternatively, add the following text directly to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Dclemens1971 (talk) 12:24, 14 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hi Vanderwaalforces, I'm sorry, but based on the above I had to disqualify you from the WikiCup. Per WP:WC/SCO: If through the WikiCup any participants are hurting the encyclopedia (whether through abusing the rules/systems, creating a negative atmosphere, or whatever else), they will be removed from the Cup.. This includes widespread use of LLMs, which is against Wikipedia policy per WP:EPAI. – Epicgenius (talk) 14:00, 18 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Per the consensus on the general matter at Wikipedia_talk:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers#Should_NPP_right_be_revoked_when_editor_is_found_to_have_used_LLMs?, I've removed the new page patroller flag from your account. If you return to Wikipedia in the future, are unblocked from articlespace, and interested in contributing at NPP again, you should feel free to re-request the permission. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:57, 27 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

October thanks

[edit]

Thank you for improving article quality in October! - miss you -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:37, 22 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

DCWC closing update

[edit]

Three weeks ago, the 2026 Developing Countries WikiContest came to a close! After three months of competition, we have our winners. Bronze Belt Buckle – 3rd place OpalYosutebito (submissions) comes in third with 525 points earned from a large series of good articles about pandas. Silver Belt Buckle – 2nd place Vestrian24Bio (submissions), with an immense number of submissions relating to cricket, comes in second with 1040 points. And our runner-up from last year makes their way to the top of the podium: Gold Belt Buckle – 1st place Simongraham (submissions) takes gold with 1065 points, coming from another round of good articles about African jumping spiders!

The award for the most countries covered goes, once again, to Simongraham (submissions) who submitted articles under 30 flags! Vestrian24Bio (submissions) tops the chart for the most quality articles (23 good articles). Kisseran (submissions) and OpalYosutebito (submissions) tie for the award for most submissions under a single country; both made 14 submissions related to China. The award for most submissions related to women goes to GreenLipstickLesbian (submissions) with 12 biographies about women. We also have a tie for the most reviews! Both Republic of Molossia Dragonhawk12 (submissions) and Simongraham (submissions) submitted 23 reviews each for the category!

Multiple DCWC records were also broken! Simongraham (submissions) set the new record for the most total points, with 1100. Vestrian24Bio (submissions) set two inaugural records, earning the contest's first featured and good topics. GreenLipstickLesbian (submissions) submitted 29 In the news entries, 12 more than the previous record.

Among the participants' contributions were six FAs, five FLs, 132 GAs, and a number of DYKs, ITNs, and reviews of every kind—far more than last year! Regardless of your level of participation, every contestant can be proud to have contributed to a major step in countering the systemic bias on Wikipedia. Every year, millions of readers and editors around the globe use Wikipedia to educate themselves and communicate with others about parts of the world that often receive less attention than they deserve. Thank you for participating in the contest and contributing to this effort. The DCWC will return next year, and we look forward to seeing your contributions again! However, before that...

We need your feedback! Join the conversation on the talk page to discuss your reflections on the contest (even if you didn't participate!) and help us make it better.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Arconning (talk · contribs), Generalissima (talk · contribs), Magentic Manifestations (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) —⁠TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 04:49, 23 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Esigie

[edit]

Esigie has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:09, 28 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Ovonramwen

[edit]

Ovonramwen has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:12, 28 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Joe Acha

[edit]
Notice

The article Joe Acha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Presumptive removal of LLM-generated content, see Wikipedia:AI noticeboard/Vanderwaalforces. Feel free to reinstate by following the procedures for disputing presumptive removal of LLM-generated content.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. 🄻os🄰 19:53, 28 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Daniel Okungbowa

[edit]
Notice

The article Daniel Okungbowa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Presumptive removal of LLM-generated content, see Wikipedia:AI noticeboard/Vanderwaalforces. Feel free to reinstate by following the procedures for disputing presumptive removal of LLM-generated content.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. 🄻os🄰 19:55, 28 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Eghosa Osaghae

[edit]
Notice

The article Eghosa Osaghae has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Presumptive removal of LLM-generated content, see Wikipedia:AI noticeboard/Vanderwaalforces. Feel free to reinstate by following the procedures for disputing presumptive removal of LLM-generated content.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. 🄻os🄰 19:56, 28 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Peter Okebukola

[edit]
Notice

The article Peter Okebukola has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Presumptive removal of LLM-generated content, see Wikipedia:AI noticeboard/Vanderwaalforces. Feel free to reinstate by following the procedures for disputing presumptive removal of LLM-generated content.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. 🄻os🄰 19:57, 28 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 20

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 02:04, 29 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Vanderwaalforces. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:01, 29 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Vanderwaalforces. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 30 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2026 November newsletter

[edit]

The 2026 WikiCup has come to an end. Our top scorers, based on the tournament point rankings (which can be seen here), are:

  1. Generalissima (submissions) with 1077 tournament points, will receive the 1st place award.
  2. Ohio Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1046 tournament points, will receive the 2nd place award.
  3. MCE89 (submissions) with 762 tournament points, will receive the 3rd place award.
  4. A.Cython (submissions) with 606' tournament points
  5. Vestrian24Bio (submissions) with 537 tournament points
  6. Reconrabbit (submissions) with 349 tournament points
  7. Delaware BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 297 tournament points
  8. Palestine Arconning (submissions) with 183 tournament points

Our three high scorers in the final round, who each got over 1,000 points, happen to all be among the top 8 as well:

  1. Generalissima (submissions) with 2846 round points from 40 good articles, 4 pieces of featured content (including 2 featured articles), 11 DYK articles, and various reviews.
  2. Ohio Bgsu98 (submissions) with 2603 round points from 43 good articles, 5 pieces of featured content (1 featured article and 4 featuyred lists), and various reviews.
  3. Vestrian24Bio (submissions) with 1141 round points from 20 good articles, a good topic, a featured list, and 30 good article reviews.

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 29 featured articles, 8 featured lists, 1 featured picture, 150 good articles, 43 good topic articles, 189 article reviews, 28 did you know articles, and 4 in the news articles. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

The top eight scorers will receive awards shortly. The following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. These prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field over the course of the competition.

  • Generalissima (submissions) wins the following prizes:
    • The featured article prize, for 12 featured articles.
    • The featured picture prize, for submitting the only featured picture for the second year in a row.
    • The good article prize, for 82 good articles.
  • Ohio Bgsu98 (submissions) wins the following prizes:
    • The featured list prize, for 21 featured lists.
    • The featured content reviewer prize, for 72 featured article reviews.
  • Vestrian24Bio (submissions) wins the following prizes:
    • The featured topic prize, for 8 pages in featured topics.
    • The good topic prize, for 26 pages in good topics.
    • The good article reviewer prize, for 84 good article reviews.
  • Sweden BabbaQ (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 9 ITN pages.
  • Delaware BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 47 DYK pages.

A special mention also goes to these users who scored the highest in a particular category in a single round:

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate. We are also looking for an experienced editor to help write the bimonthly newsletter. If you would like to help write next year's newsletters, please contact Epicgenius at his talk page.

The WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2027 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

On behalf of the judges, Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), Frostly (talk · contribs · email), Guerillero (talk · contribs · email) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs · email):

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 1 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2026 November newsletter (update)

[edit]

In our November 2026 newsletter, there was a mistake in calculating the final tournament point rankings (which have been updated here). We regret the error.

  1. Generalissima (submissions) with 1461 tournament points, will receive the 1st place award.
  2. Ohio Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1302 tournament points, will receive the 2nd place award.
  3. Vestrian24Bio (submissions) with 793 tournament points, will receive the 3rd place award.
  4. MCE89 (submissions) with 762 tournament points
  5. A.Cython (submissions) with 606 tournament points
  6. Delaware BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 425 tournament points
  7. Reconrabbit (submissions) with 349 tournament points
  8. Palestine Arconning (submissions) with 183 tournament points

On behalf of the judges, Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), Frostly (talk · contribs · email), Guerillero (talk · contribs · email) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs · email):

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 1 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

November music

[edit]
story · music · places

November begins with a Bach cantata that ends with a love duet (see story) in which he invites to the wedding and she quotes a bridal song. You know because you reviewed it, - thank you for that! - Judith Blegen was on the same page until recently, and I hope to see Marisa Manchado there soon. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:09, 3 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

In case you look: Herbert Blomstedt, remembered here. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:11, 10 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Owodo

[edit]

Owodo has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:13, 5 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:The Last Days at Forcados High School Cover 2013.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Last Days at Forcados High School Cover 2013.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 6 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Wazobia

[edit]
Notice

The article Wazobia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

disambiguation page but all links go to same place

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. HundredVisionsAndRevisions (talk) 18:30, 9 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 21

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:12, 11 November 2026 (UTC)Reply