Jump to content

Necklace problem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The necklace problem is a problem in recreational mathematics concerning the reconstruction of necklaces (cyclic arrangements of binary values) from partial information.

Formulation

[edit]

The necklace problem involves the reconstruction of a necklace of n beads, each of which is either black or white, from partial information. The information specifies how many copies the necklace contains of each possible arrangement of k black beads. For instance, for k=2, the specified information gives the number of pairs of black beads that are separated by i positions, for i=0,…,⌊n/2−1⌋. This can be made formal by defining a k-configuration to be a necklace of k black beads and n−k white beads, and counting the number of ways of rotating a k-configuration so that each of its black beads coincides with one of the black beads of the given necklace.

The necklace problem asks: if n is given, and the numbers of copies of each k-configuration are known up to some threshold k≤K, how large does the threshold K need to be before this information completely determines the necklace that it describes? Equivalently, if the information about k-configurations is provided in stages, where the kth stage provides the numbers of copies of each k-configuration, how many stages are needed (in the worst case) in order to reconstruct the precise pattern of black and white beads in the original necklace?

Upper bounds

[edit]

Alon, Caro, Krasikov and Roditty showed that 1 + log2(n) is sufficient, using a cleverly enhanced inclusion–exclusion principle.

Radcliffe and Scott showed that if n is prime, 3 is sufficient, and for any n, 9 times the number of prime factors of n is sufficient.

Pebody showed that for any n, 6 is sufficient and, in a followup paper, that for odd n, 4 is sufficient. He conjectured that 4 is again sufficient for even n greater than 10, but this remains unproven.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  • Alon, N.; Caro, Y.; Krasikov, I.; Roditty, Y. (1989). "Combinatorial reconstruction problems". J. Combin. Theory Ser. B. 47 (2): 153–161. doi:10.1016/0095-8956(89)90016-6.
  • Radcliffe, A. J.; Scott, A. D. (1998). "Reconstructing subsets of Zn". J. Combin. Theory Ser. A. 83 (2): 169–187. doi:10.1006/jcta.1998.2870.
  • Pebody, Luke (2004). "The reconstructibility of finite abelian groups". Combin. Probab. Comput. 13 (6): 867–892. doi:10.1017/S0963548303005807. S2CID 37756823.
  • Pebody, Luke (2007). "Reconstructing Odd Necklaces". Combin. Probab. Comput. 16 (4): 503–514. doi:10.1017/S0963548306007875. S2CID 13278945.
  • Paul K. Stockmeyer (1974). "The charm bracelet problem and its applications". In Bari, Ruth A.; Harary, Frank (eds.). Graphs and Combinatorics: Proceedings of the Capital Conference on Graph Theory and Combinatorics at the George Washington University, June 18–22, 1973. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Vol. 406. pp. 339–349. doi:10.1007/BFb0066456. ISBN 978-3-540-06854-9.