Talk:Concept
Add topicConcept is currently a Culture, sociology and psychology good article nominee. Nominated by Phlsph7 (talk) at 16:50, 4 April 2026 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review this article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor. When complete, this review will be closed by the reviewer. To view the review and add comments, click discuss review. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Concept article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
GA review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Concept/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Phlsph7 (talk · contribs) 16:50, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: It is a wonderful world (talk · contribs) 16:34, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
I've had my eyes on this for a while and can't wait to review. Understanding concepts was absolutely fundamental to me learning to teach better, and I can't wait to learn more about them! I have my own theory too, that concepts are encoded as sensual patterns, and I'm interested to see if that's an idea already present in the literature. Thanks for writing. IAWW (talk) 16:34, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
- Hi It is a wonderful world, thanks for reviewing this nomination. I'm looking forward to your comments. Phlsph7 (talk) 16:53, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
- Hey It is a wonderful world, just checking whether you have more review comments. Phlsph7 (talk) 09:56, 12 November 2026 (UTC)
Prose (criteria 1a, 1b and 4) 
[edit]Lead
[edit]Concept learning is the process of acquiring a new concept, which is required before an individual can use it: Doesn't this disregard possible innate concepts, which are referenced and explained elsewhere in the article? IAWW (talk) 11:24, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
- That probably depends on how "new concept" is interpreted. I changed it to "previously unknown concept" to make it clear that this does not apply to innate concepts. Phlsph7 (talk) 09:36, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Definition and central features
[edit]Roles
[edit]People can also form new concepts by combining existing ones to represent new ideas: This repeats the earlier In some cases, new concepts are formed by combining pre-existing ones, such as combining the concepts white and cat to form the concept white cat. I don't really see any reason not to cut it to prevent repetition. IAWW (talk) 16:56, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
- Removed. Phlsph7 (talk) 10:12, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Types
[edit]Complex concepts are created by combining simpler concepts to encode more specific information. In some cases, they are formed by intersecting the meanings of two concepts. For example, combining the concepts red and apple yields the complex concept red apple: Same again, but I'd be happy to keep it here as it is used to explain the idea of complex concepts. IAWW (talk) 17:00, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
- I agree: it could be challenging to properly explain complex concepts without this repetition. Phlsph7 (talk) 10:12, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Theories
[edit]This is outside the scope of the GA review, but I'm curious what theory you align with most? I think my opinion is that our brains do have necessary and sufficient conditions (which are not as easy to put into words as "unmarried adult human male"), and when we take longer to make judgements about membership, what has actually occurred is our brain is identifying a new object and deciding whether to modify the existing concept slightly. IAWW (talk) 21:07, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
- That's a challenging topic. My impression is that many cognitive processes can be involved in categorization. For some concepts, definition- or theory-based processes dominate while others are more strongly influenced by similarity-based processes. I guess this idea aligns most closely with some form of pluralism about concepts. Phlsph7 (talk) 10:12, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
- That's a great perspective and I could very well see that being the case. IAWW (talk) 21:51, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Classical
[edit]Prototypes and exemplars
[edit]Theory theory, atomism, and pluralism
[edit]As mental entities
[edit]As abstract objects
[edit]This does a really good job of explaining Platonism. I didn't know what this was but had heard the term used, and now I think I understand it relatively well. IAWW (talk) 11:24, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks, glad to hear that! Phlsph7 (talk) 09:37, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Others
[edit]History
[edit]Formation and learning
[edit]Learning mechanisms and situations
[edit]Children, animals, and artificial intelligence
[edit]In various fields
[edit]Psychology
[edit]Philosophy
[edit]Linguistics
[edit]Other fields
[edit]Sources 
[edit]The citation numbers are based on this version.
Health/formatting (criterion 2a) 
[edit]Reliability (criterion 2b) 
[edit]Spot check (criteria 2b, 2c and 2d) 
[edit]The following citations were checked manually:
[19]:
[25]:
[38]:
Copyvio (criterion 2d) 
[edit]Scope (criteria 3a and 3b) 
[edit]Stable (criterion 5) 
[edit]Media 
[edit]Tags (criterion 6a) 
[edit]Captions (criterion 6b) 
[edit]Suggestions (not needed for GA promotion)
[edit]- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees on review
- C-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- C-Class vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- C-Class Brands articles
- High-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles
- C-Class WikiProject Business articles
- High-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- C-Class education articles
- High-importance education articles
- WikiProject Education articles
- C-Class Invention articles
- High-importance Invention articles
- WikiProject Invention articles
- C-Class Linguistics articles
- High-importance Linguistics articles
- C-Class philosophy of language articles
- Philosophy of language task force articles
- WikiProject Linguistics articles
- C-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- High-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- High-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class metaphysics articles
- High-importance metaphysics articles
- Metaphysics task force articles
- C-Class philosophy of mind articles
- High-importance philosophy of mind articles
- Philosophy of mind task force articles
- High-importance philosophy of language articles

