Talk:Control-Lyapunov function
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | Unreferenced articles | |||
| ||||
or ?
[edit]At the start of the article, is function of the single variable . And at the end is dependent of also. I think that the article should be changed to avoid this. To solve it I suppose that first equation can be changed to read:
Positive definiteness of
[edit]It should be made clear if positive definiteness of is withs respect to or both and . I would say for the explanation that is only for , but I feel that something is missing in the explanation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.206.73.6 (talk) 01:56, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
Generality of Artstein's theorem
[edit]Isn't Artstein's theorem only valid for control-affine systems? - Saung Tadashi (talk) 04:01, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Requested move 9 November 2026
[edit]
 | It has been proposed in this section that Control-Lyapunov function be renamed and moved to Control Lyapunov function. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Control-Lyapunov function → Control Lyapunov function – The hyphen seems unnecessary and potentially misleading. The one source that is cited in the article that I notice using this phrase does not use the hyphen, and the hyphen may imply an incorrect relationship. Web search results seem to primarily not use the hyphen. Ngram results show the hyphenless form to be more common. Megalibgwilia (talk) 19:44, 9 November 2026 (UTC)