Talk:Do Not Pass Go

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

London

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

2002 versus 2003 edition

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It's normal to illustrate an article about a book with a low-resolution image of the first edition of that book. I've eschewed the 2002 edition in favour of the 2003. That's because the front cover of the 2002 is a mess: a combination of (A) a chopped-down version of the illustration shown in toto on the 2003 and (B) unremarkable photographs. The 2003 is far better; because it has a clear identity, it's better for "Identifying the published work", the purpose justifying "fair use". No need to take my word for it: instead, look in (say) abebooks.com for the cover of the book with the one ISBN and then for that of the book with the other ISBN. -- Hoary (talk)^WWU 👍︎ 08:54, 10 October 2026 (UTC)Reply