Talk:Harriet Chung

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Harriet Chung. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170118033025/https://stouffvilleuxbridge.snapd.com/event/849533 to https://stouffvilleuxbridge.snapd.com/event/849533

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:53, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

There's been some rapid back and forth swapping of edits concerning this section recently, and while is a form of consensus-building, a formal discussion here is likely to be more productive at this point. Does anyone have objections to how the section is currently structured? Pinging relevant editors: @Jaskar96$3X, @Eric Rizoli, @99.238.8.103, @72.136.99.208. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 06:06, 25 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Replied here. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 04:58, 26 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

The user below has a request that an edit be made to Harriet Chung. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is very high. Please be extremely patient. There are currently 1549 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. Remember to set the |answered= parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input.

NOTE: This is not AI or LLM written. While I have done research on AI to find relevant policies, everything here are my own words. You can also check GPTzero to verify that is not AI.

I would like to request that the Real Estate paragraph to be removed from the article because:

   1) There are no independent sources available other than one Toronto Star article dated 2019. CBC article is also an interview with the tenant that is basically repeating Star's reporting, and would be considered primary. WP:BLP says to omit any event that does not have multiple reliable third-party sources. For lesser-notable individuals, BLP policy asks editors to limit information to material relevant for their notability. Chiang is notable as an actor, a writer and a composer, but not as a property owner. According to BLP policy, editors should limit information to material relevant for their notability. See also WP:PUBLICFIGURE, WP:NPF 
   2) The secrion is about a news story about tenant and a possible loophole in Ontario's rental laws. Chiang is mentioned in it just as one of the co-owners. There has been no subsequent coverage and there is no result to the event after six years. Check WP:DUE, WP:NOTNEWS
   3) The phrase "then creating a notice on the same day as the sale" implies coordinated illegal activities. In the Star, it is noted that there is no way to determine whether the relationship existed between the parties, and these actions are permitted under the Residential Tenancies Act. In addition, in the paragraph it is said that "were renting out" 17 properties, but in the source it is stated only that they own 17 houses.  This is basically inference beyond the sources WP:BLP

Thanks. Outbreakday (talk) 22:56, 31 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

The user below has a request that an edit be made to Harriet Chung. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is very high. Please be extremely patient. There are currently 1549 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. Remember to set the |answered= parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input.

I would like to request that the COI tag to be removed from the main page, because all COI edits were already reverted by Toadspike on 22 April 2026. If you still see issues, please feel free to clean up or state what the issues are, so I can place another request for fixing issues.Outbreakday (talk) 22:59, 31 October 2026 (UTC)Reply