Talk:Lateral flow test

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 September 2019 and 20 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gdecent.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Currently (2018-01-11) this article is listed as "This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Please help improve the article with a good introductory style. (October 2009)" It looks to me like the note was put on in 2009 but that may also be the tag date.

Is this article good to go after 8 years of updates?

198.103.184.76 (talk) 15:43, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lateral flow test. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140415073429/http://www.ivdtechnology.com/article/concurrent-engineering-lateral-flow-diagnostics to http://www.ivdtechnology.com/article/concurrent-engineering-lateral-flow-diagnostics
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120728025400/http://www.khufash.com/bd/applications/lateral_flow/lf_main_page.htm to http://www.khufash.com/bd/applications/lateral_flow/lf_main_page.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:30, 17 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

The control line could test for the presence of the buffer testing fluid or the bodily fluid eg. saliva or both; what is it testing for? If one fails to collect enough saliva will the control fail? Aerokid (talk) 09:45, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

According to my self test the control line in covid tests appears if enough of the testning fluid is applied. No body fluid is required to trigger it. Test used was Joinstar Antigen Rapid Test R4nd0m1 (talk) 13:21, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

In very general terms, it tests that the fluid flow and attachment chemistry is (probably) working, which provides a greater confidence in a negative result. More specifics would depend on the actual test in question and the different possible forms of interference or failure. I would like the phrase "While not strictly necessary" to be considered for removal, as without a negative control, you cannot honestly claim to have a negative result - merely, not a positive result. --Oh, I'm just here for (talk) 13:21, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Can the lead section please include a short and clear explanation, in layman's terms, of how these devices work. I believe this should be possible in just one or two simple and clear sentences, right at the very start, but presently it is not achieved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C8:7B08:6A00:F570:8D01:E96B:301E (talk) 19:03, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

The user below has a request that an edit be made to Lateral flow test. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is very high. Please be extremely patient. There are currently 1603 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. Remember to set the |answered= parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input.

I work for Attogene, which supplied the lateral flow strips used in the study cited below, so I'm requesting this edit instead of making it myself.

Proposed addition, under the Uses section:

Lateral flow tests have also been applied to food authenticity testing, particularly the detection of seafood species substitution. A 2026 study combined RNase H2-dependent PCR with lateral flow detection to distinguish royal red shrimp (Pleoticus robustus) from the frequently substituted Argentine red shrimp (Pleoticus muelleri), achieving specificity comparable to DNA barcoding and testing 20 samples in about 150 minutes without sequencing. In blinded retail samples sold as royal red shrimp, 60% were found to be other species.^[1]

Optional, at the reviewer's discretion: after "lateral flow detection," add "(using commercial strips from Attogene)", supported by the same reference.

Thank you for considering this. Lford71 (talk) 15:54, 5 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

Lford71 (talk) 15:54, 5 November 2026 (UTC)Reply