Jump to content

Talk:Molten Chloride Reactor Experiment

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 days ago by Antony-22 in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

[edit]

  • Source: "The molten chloride salt fuel of the MCFR serves as both the fuel and the coolant...the fuel salt is a eutectic mixture of sodium chloride and uranium trichloride" source
    • ALT1: ... that the United States is building an experimental nuclear reactor using molten sodium chloride salt? Source: Same as above.
    • ALT2: ... that the United States is building a molten-salt nuclear reactor with sodium chloride coolant? Source: Same as above.
    • Reviewed:
    • Comment: To me, the most interesting part of this article is that the "salt" in this molten-salt reactor is regular sodium chloride. ALT hooks are slightly different wording; up to the reviewer which one sounds best.
Created by H2so4aq (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

H2so4aq (talk) 02:03, 19 October 2026 (UTC).Reply

  • @H2so4aq: New and long enough, Earwig finds no copyvios. QPQ not needed, though noting that the nominator now has 4 DYK nominations, so the next nomination will require a QPQ. An easily fixed issue with the article is that "will" should be changed to "is planned to" per WP:CRYSTAL.
The hook isn't the most interesting fact in the article. (Also, technically the U.S. government is funding a private consortium to build the reactor.) Try to go for something that would seem unusual to a layman, rather than a simple definition. Maybe that it's the first to use chloride instead of fluoride? Maybe that it's in Idaho? Actually, here's a reasonable hook:
Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 00:48, 29 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
@H2so4aq: Don't forget to fix the "will"s in the article though! Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 21:19, 29 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Antony-22:  Done H2so4aq (talk) 21:58, 29 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
@H2so4aq: Actually, one more issue. INL, like most DoE National Laboratories, is operated by a private contractor and not directly by the federal government, so the images are not actually public domain. The top image should be permissible under fair use since it's a structure under construction, but you'll have to downsize it to 250px, re-upload it to Wikipedia (not Commons), and include Template:Non-free use rationale on the image page. See WP:FUR for full instructions. Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 23:39, 31 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Antony-22: Good catch; I've removed both images. Neither one seems to satisfy the free-use criteria (that monochrome top image is not high-quality enough to clearly show the reactor or layout), so unless you feel strongly otherwise I'm good keeping them out for now. H2so4aq (talk) 19:29, 2 November 2026 (UTC)Reply
The article is good to go, we just need a hook-only review for ALT3 since I suggested it. Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 22:49, 5 November 2026 (UTC)Reply