Jump to content

Talk:Pray.com

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 days ago by JR at Pray in topic America Prays (September 2025)

COI request to add infobox

[edit]

Hello, I'm a Pray.com employee operating as the company's representative on Wikipedia. I was wondering if it might be possible to add an infobox to this article. I've mocked one up, complete with a wordmark logo that I recently uploaded to Wikimedia Commons.

Pray.com
IndustryFaith-based media and technology
Founded2016; 10 years ago (2016)
FoundersSteve Gatena, Michael Lynn, Ryan Beck, and Matthew Potter
Websitepray.com

If an independent editor could take a look, I would much appreciate it. Thanks! JR at Pray (talk) 19:49, 12 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Done   MetalBreaksAndBends   (talk) (contribs) 15:50, 13 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

COI request for article rewrite

[edit]

Hello, I've written a new draft for this article that I think improves it in a number of ways. I have kept nearly all the existing content intact, improving sourcing where possible. My draft also:

  • Revises and shortens the introduction a bit, relocating some of its content into the body of the article
  • Creates/relocates a few sections, so that not all non-introduction content is under the History heading
  • Adds several new passages to the History about the company's growth and evolution
  • Adds a passage about Pray's AI Bible, which is probably the most significant product we've launched in the past few years
  • Adds a few brief passages about notable partnerships with celebrities and the Trump White House

Below is the entire article draft. I'm completely open to working with editors on this piece-by-piece, but since my draft does contains significant reorganization of the existing article, I thought it would be a good idea to propose everything at once, so that the community can see the totality of what I'm trying to accomplish:

Thanks in advance to any editors who take the time to review this draft! JR at Pray (talk) 17:34, 23 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Not done: A majority of the requested changes are currently written in a promotional tone. Please review WP:Neutral point of view and ensure you follow this before submitting any edit requests. 🄻🄰 13:18, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the review and for the clear feedback. You were right that the draft read promotionally, and proposing a full rewrite in a single block was a mistake on my part. I will work through the article in smaller, individually sourced requests going forward. Appreciate the time you spent on it. JR at Pray (talk) 16:19, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

COI request: add date to Censorship in China section

[edit]

Hello, I am a Pray.com employee editing with a declared paid COI. This is a small single-fact request, and I am deliberately keeping it to one change after my April rewrite request was correctly declined for tone.

The "Censorship in China" section does not say when the removal happened, which leaves the reader unable to place the event. The date is already supported by the two sources cited in that same section.

Current text:

The app was removed from Apple's App Store in China as part of the country's broader efforts to restrict access to religious content.

Proposed text:

In February 2024, the app was removed from Apple's App Store in China as part of the country's broader efforts to restrict access to religious content.

Sourcing: Both already cited in the section. Kumar, Anugrah (February 24, 2024), "Pray.com removed from Apple App Store in China, restricting access to content", The Christian Post; and "China bans Pray.com app" (February 22, 2024), UPI.

This adds four words and changes nothing else. Thanks to any editor who takes a look. JR at Pray (talk) 16:25, 9 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Done Packrat3860 (talk) 01:13, 10 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Go ahead: I have reviewed these proposed changes and suggest that you go ahead and make the proposed changes to the page. 🄻os🄰 15:55, 10 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks both. Packrat3860 already implemented this at 01:12 on 10 September, so no further action is needed here. I appreciate the offer to edit directly, but as a paid editor I would rather keep everything going through edit requests so the process stays visible on the record. JR at Pray (talk) 19:01, 10 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

COI request: remove promotional language (three sentences)

[edit]

Hello, I am a Pray.com employee editing with a declared paid COI. In July an editor correctly declined a draft of mine for promotional tone. Reviewing the live article since then, I found three sentences that read promotionally about my own employer. I am requesting their removal or trimming. All three are cuts, none are additions.

1. Remove the opening sentence of "Funding and development".

Current: Pray.com has secured significant funding to support its development and growth. In 2017, the platform raised...
Proposed: delete the first sentence entirely, so the section begins In 2017, the platform raised...
Reason: "significant" is unsourced editorializing, and the sentence adds nothing the specific figures that follow do not already say.

2. Remove the second sentence of the Sting Ray Robb passage.

Current: The partnership, highlighting Robb's Christian faith, aims to engage younger audiences with faith-based content.
Proposed: delete this sentence. The surrounding sentences about the sponsorship and the car's debut are factual and should stay.
Reason: it states corporate marketing intent ("aims to engage") as fact, and the cited sources do not support it as anything other than company framing.

3. Remove "notable" from the radio drama sentence.

Current: ...productions with notable actors such as Kristen Bell and Blair Underwood narrating biblical stories.
Proposed: ...productions with actors such as Kristen Bell and Blair Underwood narrating biblical stories.
Reason: WP:PEACOCK lists "notable" as a word to avoid. Both actors have articles, so the link already establishes it. This also fixes a stray double space before Kristen Bell's name.

No content is being added and no sourced material is being removed. Thanks to any editor who takes a look. JR at Pray (talk) 17:19, 17 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

@JR at Pray: Thanks. I've made those changes. I actually removed the whole sponsorship section though as the sourcing was poor. SmartSE (talk) 19:05, 17 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks SmartSE, and no objection to the wider removal. I checked the Palantir citation afterwards and everything I can find traces back to a single Business Wire release, so I agree it did not meet the bar. If genuinely independent coverage of either partnership turns up later I will propose it here rather than assume it qualifies. JR at Pray (talk) 22:21, 17 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

COI request: add download figure and chatbot (New York Times)

[edit]

Hello, I am a Pray.com employee editing with a declared paid COI. Two single-sentence additions, both from one source.

The article gives no indication of the platform's size anywhere, and does not mention the company's AI chatbot. A September 2025 New York Times article covers both in a single sentence: "Now, apps like Pray.com — which has about 25 million downloads — are rolling out chatbots, too."

1. At the end of the first paragraph of the lead:

As of September 2025, the app had about 25 million downloads.

2. At the end of the "AI content" section:

In 2025, Pray.com began rolling out an AI chatbot.

Source for both: Jackson, Lauren (September 14, 2025). "Finding God in the App Store". The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/us/chatbot-god.html

I have proposed the download figure for the lead because scale is normally basic identifying information under WP:LEAD, but the "Funding and development" subsection would work as well and I have no preference.

No other changes requested. Thanks to any editor who takes a look. JR at Pray (talk) 13:11, 18 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Not done: Sounds like WP:CORPTRIV, specifically the fourth bullet point. —Leaf.Sheap ⇖ /.°°.\ ⇗ (They•Them) 18:16, 10 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

COI request: expand AI content section (Christianity Today, NPR)

[edit]

Hello, I am a Pray.com employee editing with a declared paid COI. This is a section-level request on a single topic, proposed as a replacement for the "AI content" section.

The section says little about what The AI Bible is or how it is produced. A September 2025 Christianity Today interview covers both and is not yet cited in the article. Unlike my last request, which was correctly declined under WP:CORPTRIV as a passing mention, both sources here are substantively about this subject: the NPR piece is reported on the company's AI content, and the Christianity Today piece is an interview with a company executive about it.

I am also dropping the existing clause "with some videos having millions of views", which I do not think the cited NPR source supports.

Proposed replacement for the "AI content" section:

Pray.com began using artificial intelligence to generate imagery in the 2020s. In 2025 it launched The AI Bible, a series of AI-generated videos depicting Bible stories, distributed on YouTube, Instagram and TikTok. Max Bard, the company's vice president of content, said scripts are written by staff writers, one of whom is a pastor, before images and animation are produced using tools including ChatGPT, Claude and Midjourney. Bard described the format as "edutainment - education and entertainment", and said it drew viewers who are not Christian.
The videos received mixed reviews. Brad East, a professor of theology at Abilene Christian University, said they had a "Marvel aesthetic in all the worst ways" and that they reduce the Bible to an action movie. Writing in Christianity Today, Bonnie Kristian questioned the theological depth of the series' treatment of the Book of Job, noting that most of the book is compressed into a single spoken verse, and raised concerns about sexualized depictions of female biblical figures. Paul Hoffman said he was "always a fan of anything that drives interest ... in the Bible".

Sources:

Kristian, Bonnie (September 9, 2025). "The AI Bible: 'We Call It Edutainment'". Christianity Today. https://www.christianitytoday.com/2025/09/ai-bible-pray-website-interview/
NPR, already cited in this section, supports Brad East's affiliation and the "action movie" characterisation.

Thanks to any editor who takes a look. JR at Pray (talk) 15:13, 16 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Response: 2026-10-24

[edit]

Not done: This interview is with one of Pray.com's VPs. We need to base our articles on what independent sources have to say about you. Also, the NPR article says specifically with some videos getting millions of views. Packrat3860 (talk) 21:09, 24 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, both points taken. You are right about the NPR wording on view counts and I should have checked the source more carefully before saying otherwise. And the independence point is fair: the Christianity Today piece is an interview with our VP, so the production details and framing in it are us talking about ourselves, not independent coverage. I will stick to independent sources going forward. JR at Pray (talk) 13:04, 26 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
please don't use AI to talk to us Packrat3860 (talk) 13:20, 26 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

America Prays (September 2025)

[edit]

Can we please add one sentence at the end of the "US National Day of Prayer" subsection?

In September 2025, Pray.com was named among the initial participants in America Prays, a prayer initiative launched by President Donald Trump ahead of the United States Semiquincentennial.[1][2]

Fox News and CBN both name Pray.com on their own, so none of this is our wording. I left out our press release and the "official technology partner" line since that's self-published and I know it wouldn't hold up here.

Let me know your thoughts. JR at Pray (talk) 17:13, 27 October 2026 (UTC)Reply