Talk:Quoting out of context

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2012; 2013; 2014; 2015; 2016; 2017; 2018;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Marketing & Advertising Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Philosophy: Logic Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

Skepticism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory, conspiracy theories, and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

What would be a fallacy where a thing is taken out of all contexts?

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Person C is making a concept objectively true by claiming that context has no effect on it.

This reminds me of Analytic–synthetic distinction like person C is making a analytic truth of something that is synthetical.

Also a monad in Leibnitz's thinking: monadizing a concept by force.

Claiming something objectively true is claiming that it is context-free.Pasixxxx (talk) 07:18, 4 July 2024 (UTC) Reply

This LLM-generated text has been collapsed and should be excluded from assessments of consensus.

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Chatgpt (gpt4-o)

"The fallacy you are describing, where a concept is taken out of all contexts and claimed to be objectively true without any consideration for context, could be considered a form of reductionism. Reductionism is the fallacy of oversimplifying complex phenomena by reducing them to a single, narrow explanation or perspective. In this case, reducing a concept to an objective truth without acknowledging the influence of context or nuance could be seen as a form of reductionism.

Another term that could apply to this fallacy is absolutism. Absolutism is the belief that certain things are true in all circumstances and are not subject to change or variation. Claiming that a concept is objectively true and context-free could be seen as an absolutist stance, ignoring the potential for variability and nuance in different situations.

Overall, the fallacy you describe involves oversimplifying and stripping away all contextual information from a concept in order to claim it as universally true, which can lead to misunderstandings and errors in reasoning."

Reductionism, absolutism, oversimplifying Pasixxxx (talk) 07:34, 4 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Archives (Index)
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
This page is archived by ClueBot III.