Jump to content

Talk:Wikipedia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 days ago by Jim.henderson in topic Should I add the downfall of Wikipedia??

Former featured articleWikipedia is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
On this day...Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 5, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
March 9, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
April 4, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 9, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 4, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
April 1, 2006Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
August 1, 2006Featured article reviewDemoted
September 15, 2006Good article nomineeListed
February 25, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
August 12, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
August 15, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
July 21, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
July 26, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
November 7, 2012Featured article candidateNot promoted
August 25, 2014Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
September 5, 2014Good article reassessmentDelisted
May 21, 2021Peer reviewReviewed
February 4, 2023Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 12, 2023Peer reviewReviewed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on January 15, 2005, and January 15, 2026.
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of February 7, 2007.
Current status: Former featured article

Should we add that Wikipedia is the first article ever?

I was thinking of adding it but to avoid me getting yelled at I want to think if should the fact (.) 14:29, 17 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

If you can provide reliable sources, sure! SeaDragon1 (talk, contributions) 19:37, 28 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
I am often mistaken, but vaguely I remember that all the articles in Wikipedia were lost in a crash a week or two after it started, so the question relies on vague memories of the earliest editors. One version has it that the first article was about some technical concept used in Linux. If I am not mistaken in this matter, then anything we say on the topic of first article will be more about legends or mythology than about verifiable historical facts. Jim.henderson (talk) 05:48, 6 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

History section removal

On September 21, the "History" section was removed.

This causes the layout to be strange as it is starting off with level-3 headings instead of level-2.

Is this consensus based? It hasn't been reverted for two days. TheSilksongPikmin (talk | contribs) 19:06, 23 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Done, thanks for noticing this good faith removal. Yes, a discussion would be needed, and the benefit of the 'History' section title is that it includes the main link to 'History of Wikipedia'. Thanks again. Randy Kryn (talk) 00:45, 24 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Should I add the downfall of Wikipedia??

Right now, Wikipedia is going through crisis needing donations. Should I add it, and where? Mark The Chill (talk) 19:41, 17 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Find a few sources first, specifically ones that follow WP:VERIFY. Remember, prioritize verifiability over truth. | One Reaction was here. Got a complaint? 15:47, 20 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Crises generally have a beginning date. For example, the July Crisis began with an assassination, though it was a culmination of a long series of developments. As far as I know there is no beginning date for the crisis you refer to. If we are to address this topic, Predictions of the end of Wikipedia is perhaps a better place for it. Jim.henderson (talk) 14:52, 6 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

Conditions for future donations: Respecting workers

I'm not sure where to put this feedback where it won't disappear into the void, so I'm logging it here. Please let me know where it belongs, and will get to the eyeballs that need to see it.

I just saw the WP donate message, which mentioned that donations are down this year. I can guess at why.

I have been editing WP on and off since it began, and despite surviving on a disability benefit, I have donated in the past. But I will not be doing so this year. Because of the unionbusting and unjustified dismissals (IMHO) carried out by the short-sighted managerialists (or to use Ed Zitron's less polite term, 'Business Idiots') currently in control of the WM Foundation. I will continue to edit WP, for now, but I will never again donate to WMF unless they;

  • rehire all dismissed workers who are willing to return
  • publicly apologise for their anti-worker conduct, and especially for hiring unionbusting management 'consultants'
  • hold a formal review of management decision-making open to all WP editors, and commit to a constitutional change that would forbid any such anti-worker conduct conduct or expenditure in the future
  • make a donation to an organisation that actively supports unionisation of tech workers, at twice the value of the total spend on management consultants in 2026

WMF management really shit the bed on this one, behaving more like BrandCramp corp than a responsible common steward. If they can't convince the community that this will be addressed, at the deepest possible level, I suspect there will be a forking of WP in the foreseeable future. Danylstrype (talk) 00:13, 24 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

This is the wrong place to put this. This page is intended for discussion and improvement of this article NightWolf1223 <Howl at me • My hunts> 00:26, 25 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft or Article deleted

Should I inform my web person to write for if ni cannot write my autobiography? Saheed Aderemi Yussuf Olubodun (talk) 12:25, 26 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Help support

Do I require any formal training to do all this apart from reading the guidelines properly .?? Saheed Aderemi Yussuf Olubodun (talk) 12:27, 26 October 2026 (UTC)Reply