User talk:APPU

Thanks for your contributions to KALYANI. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti (talk) 02:33, 20 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Thilsebatti. An edit that you recently made to KALYANI seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. Thilsebatti (talk) 02:34, 20 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Category:Dharwad has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 12:24, 20 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:KALYANI (Remix).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 22 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pharmaceutical industry in India, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puducherry was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Narendramodi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 19#Alanturing. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can request undeletion. Fork99 (talk) 10:55, 12 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

The article Article 21 of the Constitution of India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is (at least in my opinion) solely AI-generated. The writing is similar to that of an LLM, and it scored 100% on the GPTZero Wikipedia AI detector . Furthermore, another potential indicator is that other text had been copied and pasted here and was a copyvio, so it had to be removed, indicating that if copy-and-pasting was the normal process for the author, they may have used AI for this. As per WP:LLM, I have considered the way this has been edited instead of just using language indicators, so I do believe that this article should not be on the mainspace and should probably be deleted.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Equivalent-Text2598 (talk) 07:26, 4 October 2026 (UTC)Reply