User talk:AhsinXmojo32

Hi AhsinXmojo32! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Happy editing! -- Toddy1 (talk) 12:12, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the welcome and for guiding me. I’m still new here, so I really appreciate the help. I’ll keep your advice in mind and try to learn the guidelines properly. Thanks again! AhsinXmojo32 (talk) 15:07, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

I see that you have an interest in the children of Ali ibn Abi Talib. There was a deletion discussion for an article on one of them at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umama bint Ali - it lasted from 5 to 19 August 2025. But you did not participate. You tried to recreate the article a year later. You cannot just ignore the decisions of past deletion discussions. If you do, you get reverted, as happened today.

One possible solution would be to add a list of Ali's known children to the body of the article on him (i.e. not just the list in the infobox). You could put a little bit of information against each name. But if you do that, make sure that you provide citations to reliable sources that show where the information came from. WP:VERIFY says: "People must be able to check that facts and claims in Wikipedia articles are not just made up. This means each fact or claim must be attributable to reliable, published sources. Additionally, quotations and any facts or claims challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by inline citations."-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:12, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

I understand what you mean. To be honest, I’m genuinely interested in working on the Umama bint Ali article. I only saved the article in that state because I was still collecting and checking more information and planned to improve it further. I wasn’t trying to ignore the previous deletion discussion or go against the decision. I was just working on the article and probably should have taken the previous discussion into account first. I’ll make sure any information I add is properly sourced and cited. AhsinXmojo32 (talk) 14:56, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Also, I’m still quite new here and I don’t really have any friends or experienced editors who can guide me. If you’re comfortable with it, I’d be happy to have you as a friend here and learn from your experience. I’d really appreciate your guidance as I learn how things work on Wikipedia. AhsinXmojo32 (talk) 14:59, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Another thing you can do is to create an article in "draft space". See Wikipedia:Drafts.

There would be no objection to you creating Draft:Umama bint Ali - you might want to decide whether that is the right spelling - Umamah bint Ali is another way of spelling the name. If you want to copy text from old versions of the deleted article, you can see the history at Umama bint Ali (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). If you copy stuff from one Wikipedia article to another, you are meant to give attribution in your edit summary (see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia).-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:52, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the suggestion. I would prefer to work on the article in Draft space, as I tend to write slowly and carefully. This will give me enough time to research the sources and prepare the article properly before submitting it for review AhsinXmojo32 (talk) 06:32, 18 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Sylv302. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Asma bint Utarid, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The citations could use some links or ISBNs if they are books. Id be happy to help if you'd like! You also do not need to write out all of the citations like you did at the bottom of the article. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia and thank you for doing bold editing! Sylv302 (talk) 13:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

I messed up the link to the article my bad, the article in question is Asma bint Utarid. Sylv302 (talk) 13:04, 4 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Sylv302,

Thanks for pointing that out. I understand what you mean now. I’ll go back and check the edit, add proper reliable sources, and make sure the citations are formatted correctly before I add it again.

Also, thanks for the tip about not putting all the citations at the bottom like that. I’m still getting the hang of Wikipedia, so I really appreciate the help.

Thanks again! AhsinXmojo32 (talk) 15:45, 4 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) to Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Fatima bint Aqil and Asma bint Utarid, as LLM-generated content is prohibited on Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. ‑‑gurkubondinn 14:48, 9 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asma bint Utarid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asma bint Utarid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Redvelvetvanilaaaaaaaaa (talk) 14:49, 4 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Redvelvetvanilaaaaaaaaa,

I understand that the article is currently being discussed for deletion. I’m still working on improving it and adding proper sources, but I’m a 12th-grade student and currently quite busy with college and my studies, so I may not be able to fix everything at once.

Would it be possible to move the article to my draft space instead of deleting it? That would give me some time to properly work on the sources and improve the article when I have enough time.

I’d really appreciate it. Thank you for understanding. AhsinXmojo32 (talk) 15:51, 4 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

No, the English Wikipedia does not accept AI-generated material. The WP:NOLLM guideline prohibits this. ‑‑gurkubondinn 14:52, 9 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

How can you conclude that my entire work is AI-generated in just one day? I have put genuine time and effort into researching and developing this article. Please judge the work based on its content and sources rather than making assumptions. AhsinXmojo32 (talk) 07:58, 10 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Fatima bint Aqil. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ‑‑gurkubondinn 14:49, 9 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

I appreciate the move to draftspace, but I strongly disagree with the claim that my work is machine-generated. How can my hard work be dismissed as AI-generated without proper evidence? Please judge the article by its content and sources. AhsinXmojo32 (talk) 08:00, 10 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Umm Farwa bint Abu Quhafa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umm Farwa bint Abu Quhafa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Moarnighar (talk) 07:49, 15 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Lubaba al-Ṣughra bint al-Harith requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model. Text produced by these applications is prohibited on Wikipedia. For further information, see section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse.

AriuCH (talk) 18:57, 18 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I have been reverting several of your recent additions, namely unsourced and exhaustive lists of wives and children of various early Islamic-period figures to infoboxes. First, unless there's any demonstrable notability, such long lists in infoboxes defeat their purpose of providing quick pertinent facts about the subject. Second, you need to cite the information to reliable sources (RS). Best practice in these cases would be to add such information to the article body along with notable information about the wives and children (instead of just a long list) and cite it to RS. If no contextual info is available, then the list could be put into a footnote. --Al Ameer (talk) 15:41, 15 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Al Ameer, thanks for pointing this out. I understand what you mean. I’ll be more careful with these edits and make sure the information is properly sourced. I’ll also move detailed lists out of infoboxes and into the article body where appropriate. Thanks for the feedback. AhsinXmojo32 (talk) 15:44, 15 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please stop. If you continue to edit Wikipedia using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology), as you did at Fatima bint Aqil, you may be blocked from editing. Adding LLM-generated content is prohibited on Wikipedia. Kisseran (talk) 15:10, 7 November 2026 (UTC)Reply