User talk:Alejito2016

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Alejito2016. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 08:11, 10 January 2020 (UTC) Agustín Della CorteReply

Hello, Alejito2016,

Thank you for creating Coalición Multicolor.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating this article

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Abishe}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Abishe (talk) 06:53, 26 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Alejito2016,

Thank you for creating Ministry of Social Development (Uruguay).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Expansion and addition of RS needed. Note that all references are not independent and reliable.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|WikiAviator}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

WikiAviator (talk) 04:02, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Alejito2016,

Thank you for creating Ministry of National Defense (Uruguay).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Avoid using over-positive writing styles (See WP:NPOV) and please add more sources to verify the notability of the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|WikiAviator}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

WikiAviator (talk) 04:13, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Alejito2016,

Thank you for creating Álvaro Delgado Ceretta.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Sources needed.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|WikiAviator}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

WikiAviator (talk) 10:10, 7 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eduardo Bonomi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rocha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 31 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daniel Olesker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Leuven (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your edits to COVID-19 pandemic in Uruguay. Remember that numbers in the thousands must include a comma, as in "1,000" and not "1000". Thank you. --Spaastm (talk) 14:48, 30 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi, when translating from other language wikis, such as at Pablo Iturralde, you need to give attribution:

• You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary Content in this edit is translated from the existing Spanish Wikipedia article at es:Pablo Iturralde; see its history for attribution.
• You should also add the template {{Translated|es|Pablo Iturralde}} to the talk page.
• For more guidance, see Wikipedia:Translation.

Regards --John B123 (talk) 08:27, 4 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Andrés Peña, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cahk (talk) 08:36, 30 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Latin American Center for Human Economy. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:44, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal.

I've noticed your edits to Uruguayan music and thought you might be interested. Erick (talk) 22:29, 1 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Alejito2016,

Thank you for creating Jimena Sabaris.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

References presented are primary. WP:NACTOR requires significant roles. The roles outlined in the references are not significant.

This article needs more references to satisfy notability for biography of living persons. What is needed are references giving significant coverage about this person, and independent of them, in multiple secondary sources which are reliable - WP:RS; that is your guide.
You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources.
Pages of photographs, mentions of this person on pages about other topics do not garner notability.

A more comprehensive guide is WP:BASIC ... People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. Lack of attention to the above is likely to mean that the article may not be suitable for inclusion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 06:52, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Boa noite, Alejito2016.

In this context, please compare

• es:Colegio Nacional José Pedro Varela
• Colegio Nacional José Pedro Varela

User:Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 10:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from es.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. I’ve added it for you. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 07:04, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sofía Rodríguez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sofía Rodríguez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 // Timothy :: talk  07:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

When you edit, please remember your obligation to provide an edit summary in the box provided for the purpose. If you omit to do so, as you did recently with the article Montevideo, it makes more work for your fellow editors, which was not your intention. Just a kind reminder ;) Ttocserp 13:17, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Alejito2016. Thank you for your work on 1983 Uruguayan pro-democracy demonstration. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:08, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your kind words. It is a pleasure to work to contribute to knowledge on Wikipedia! Alejito2016 (talk) 21:36, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Alejito2016,

Thank you for creating Batlle family.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi, Alejito2016 nice work!, you may add more categories.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dcotos (talk) 06:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Alejito2016. Thank you for your work on Elena Martínez Rosso. Bastun, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi Alejito2016, nice work on your new article. It would benefit from being added to appropriate Wikiprojects, and the addition of a photo or a 'photo needed' template. Good job!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Alejito2016. Thank you for your work on Naval Club Pact. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:27, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Alejito2016. Thank you for your work on Jorge Wilson Menéndez. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Mothers of presidents of Uruguay has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 21:46, 29 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Alejito2016. Thank you for your work on Secretary of the Presidency of Uruguay. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:34, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Alejito2016. Thank you for your work on Murder of Pascasio Báez. Another editor, JFHJr, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please use ref markup (see Template:Cite news for example) including language and translations of titles. It makes the markup large, but the refs are easier to understand for English language readers.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|JFHJr}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JFHJr (㊟) 23:03, 12 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Escuela Naval Uruguay.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:31, 17 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi Alejito2016. Thank you for your work on Montero Palace. Another editor, Noleander, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noleander}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Noleander (talk) 18:25, 23 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Sahaib. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Fede Vigevani have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sahaib (talk) 11:49, 1 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi Alejito2016. Thank you for your work on Santos Palace. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 01:11, 15 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question on an edit re:name sorting Rpyle731^talk 09:35, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from es:Fernanda Auersperg to Fernanda Auersperg. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. C F A 01:53, 6 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Please be sure in the future, when adding information to articles, you provide a reliable source. If an appropriate source cannot be found, then it should not be added to the article. livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:37, 11 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Template:Yamandú Orsi sidebar has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:49, 7 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Liceo Militar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 08:38, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Agustín Della Corte. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:15, 20 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Alejito2016. Thank you for your work on Palacio de los Tribunales, Montevideo. Another editor, Ingratis, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for this article. Please see MOS:CURLY for apostrophes, which is a minor matter, and WP:TFOLWP for how to attribute translations from Wikipedias in other languages, which is important. I've done the necessary on this occasion. Best wishes.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ingratis}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ingratis (talk) 09:13, 28 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ignacio Álvarez Aguerre, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Current affairs was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 6 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Liceo José Enrique Rodó. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 22:43, 21 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Catholic University of Uruguay buildings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Catholic University of Uruguay buildings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boynamedsue (talk) 12:31, 30 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to BBVA Uruguay. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 00:03, 24 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Maximiliano Araújo. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Rejoy²⁰⁰³(talk) 04:33, 20 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello Rejoy 2023,

I am familiar with Wikipedia’s policies, which is why I edited the article on Maximiliano Araújo. The information you added regarding a supposed Indian origin is not verifiable. It is based solely on claims published by certain media outlets, without providing any independent or reliable evidence.

There are no public statements from the player, no indication from his surnames, and no publicly available immigration records supporting such an assertion. As such, the material does not meet Wikipedia’s verifiability requirements.

This is not a content dispute in terms of interpretation, but rather a matter of sourcing. The sources provided do not establish the claim; they merely repeat it without evidence. In addition, your edit introduced a specific place, which is not supported by any cited and verified source.

In my edit summary, I clearly explained the reasons for removal. Your reversion characterized the removal as “bigotry” without addressing the sourcing concerns or providing stronger references. As a matter of principle, it is not the responsibility of an editor removing unsourced material to initiate a discussion in order to justify its removal. Rather, if you wish to include contested information, it is your responsibility to open a talk page discussion and demonstrate its reliability with appropriate sources. Unsourced or unverified material should not be added in the first place.

In conclusion, there is no reliable evidence that Maximiliano Araújo has ancestry from Goa beyond unverified claims in some media reports. Per Wikipedia policy, such material cannot be included without reliable, independent sourcing.

I am open to discussion if you can provide stronger sources that meet Wikipedia’s reliability standards.

Kind regards, Alejito2016 (talk) 05:53, 20 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Alejito2016. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Maximiliano Araújo, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. We ask that you:

• Avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors
• Disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI)
• Propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions
• Avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming)

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation for any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

See the FAQ for article subjects for more information.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Rejoy²⁰⁰³(talk) 07:22, 20 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Maximiliano Araújo. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:25, 20 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, @The Bushranger

I do not believe I should be blocked, since my actions were aimed at ensuring that content is properly sourced and that no unverified claims are added to Wikipedia without corroboration. My concern was specifically with the inclusion of material that was not supported by reliable verification.

At the same time, another user continued to repeatedly edit the article, reintroducing the same disputed content without addressing the sourcing issues I raised in the talk page. This ongoing cycle of reversion and re-addition is what led me to request page protection, in order to prevent further edit warring and to ensure the matter is properly discussed on the talk page. Alejito2016 (talk) 07:34, 20 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

You violated the three revert-rule, a bright-line rule. "This content is inadequately sourced" is not an exception to 3RR. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:35, 20 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the explanation!

Just to know, what should I do the next time another user insists on editing while ignoring the discussion on the talk page, violating Wikipedia’s citation rules, and making arbitrary edits? In this case, the other user also began alleging a conflict of interest, even though I cited a news outlet that reported statements from the player’s family.

Kind regards Alejito2016 (talk) 07:39, 20 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alejito2016 (block log · active blocks · global blocks · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · creation log · change block settings · unblock · checkuser (log) · SI)

---

Request reason:

I reverted edits made by another user who, despite the discussion on the talk page, continued to reintroduce unsourced and unverified information, relying on sources that merely repeat the same claim without independent verification. In response to my comment that the information had already been reported as false and referenced in Uruguayan media, including statements attributed to the player’s partner, the other user raised allegations of some kind of conflict of interest. Instead of reading my edit and the cited source, the other user introduced accusations that diverted the discussion from concerns about the "sources" he/she added. My edits were made solely to enforce Wikipedia’s requirements regarding verifiability and reliable sourcing.

Decline reason:

Regardless of how justified you believe your edits to be, edit warring is not an appropriate way of going about them. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 09:36, 20 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 5 § Television series debuts and endings by year on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:23, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Alejito2016. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Liceo José Enrique Rodó, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:07, 21 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Alejito2016,

Thank you for creating Sigismund of Habsburg-Lorraine.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Article needs more significant secondary coverage in reliable sources. Citations are brief mentions, primary sources, an article about his mother, an interview, and a light piece about his wedding. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archduke Sigismund of Austria (born 1966).

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dreamyshade}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dreamyshade (talk) 08:08, 14 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Alejito2016. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Liceo José Enrique Rodó".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:57, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please make sure you are strictly following WP:LLMT (also WP:NOLLM), including ensuring that the sources support the content, and attributing per WP:TFOLWP. LLM-generated content is not permitted outside of translations from other language Wikipedias. Thank you Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 13:49, 27 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:AI noticeboard/Alejito2016 regarding an AI cleanup investigation which may be related to you. Please respond over there. Per WP:COMMUNICATE, if you continue to to edit without discussing this, you will be blocked. Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 20:42, 5 November 2026 (UTC)Reply