User talk:Archaeaoris

Hi Archaeaoris! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! --🐦DrWho42👻 08:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello Archaeaoris! Your additions to Metronomi have been removed in whole or in part, because they contained copyright violations. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, we take copyright very seriously. You cannot copy text from your sources. Everything you contribute needs to be written in your own words, and avoid too close paraphrasing. If you own the copyright of the content you want to use, please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.

Continuing to violate our copyright policy may lead you to be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:19, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:38, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Antigonus III Doson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Philip V. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Greek Epithets has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 14:52, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Abantiades (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:41, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article Abantiades (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Invalid and unnecessary disambiguation page per WP:ONEOTHER.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 23:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Archaeaoris,

I'm CoconutOctopus, and I patrol new pages here on Wikipedia.

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged a page that you created (Melampodes) for deletion because it is unnecessary per one of the criteria at WP:G14.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CoconutOctopus}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CoconutOctopus talk 22:52, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Archaeaoris. Thank you for your work on Lagobolon. Another editor, StarTrekker, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Pretty interesting. Fixed some minor details before reviewing.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|StarTrekker}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

★Trekker (talk) 20:57, 9 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi Archaeaoris. Thank you for your work on Astrateias graphe. Another editor, JackFromWisconsin, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Hi Archaeaoris, thanks for creating this article. I am having a hard time verifying the claims made in this article in the sources you provided. Per our verifiability policy inline citations must be directly after all material claimed in an article. Generally I aim for every sentence or every other. Again thanks for your efforts on this article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|JackFromWisconsin}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 22:26, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi Archaeaoris. Thank you for your work on Crepida. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 01:58, 24 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Please see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_October_24#Category:4th-century_churches_by_country. – Fayenatic London 10:57, 24 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Epirus revolt of 1611. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 21:49, 6 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello Archaeaoris,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Xenares (lover of Cleomenes III) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

ViridianPenguin🐧 (💬) 23:38, 7 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Archaeaoris. Thank you for your work on Kalauropes. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

what is this? not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:09, 21 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@MPGuy2824: Hello, this is the plural form, which can be found in some sources. I have also added it to the article to avoid any confusion. Archaeaoris (talk)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phryctoria, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trojans was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 30 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 June 17 § Islamic terrorism in (country) on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Staraction (talk · contribs) 05:05, 17 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heracles, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cos was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:11, 12 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Astrateias graphe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astrateias graphe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

TangoWhiskeyDelta (talk) 04:55, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, it is prohibited to write or rewrite articles on Wikipedia using AI chatbots like ChatGPT. In addition to being prohibited, it is also a bad idea, as many of your articles appear to be plagiarized from other sources and will therefore have to be deleted or completely rewritten. I have been working to clean up the edits you have already made. Please make sure all future edits are entirely human-written. Let me know if you have any questions about this. -- LWG ^{talk (VOPOV)} 21:23, 13 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Archaeaoris. Thank you for your work on Telephus of Pergamum. Another editor, Scope creep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Could do with an image. Seems to be a lot of statues about of him.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creepTalk 17:54, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply