User talk:Atrivo
Add topicA page you started (Robert Lindsay(Sylhet)) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Robert Lindsay(Sylhet), Atrivo!
Wikipedia editor MB298 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
While the article does not contain much, after checking the sources subject does seem to be notable. I will create a talk page and move it to Robert Lindsay (Sylhet). MB298 (talk) 00:57, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
To reply, leave a comment on MB298's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Munak canal has been accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
/wiae /tlk 16:51, 22 February 2016 (UTC)A page you started (Sultanate of M’Simbati) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Sultanate of M’Simbati, Atrivo!
Wikipedia editor Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Fascinating new article . Cheers!
To reply, leave a comment on Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
— O Fortuna! Imperatrix mundi. 17:22, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Newquist Group
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Newquist Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nat Gertler (talk) 02:26, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Ray Clark (JBS) for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ray Clark (JBS) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Clark (JBS) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LibraryGurl (talk) 01:44, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
October 2017
[edit]
A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Atlantic306 (talk) 23:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Atrivo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Atrivo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Atrivo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 10
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mark Cubbon (army officer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fanam.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Speaking of your update that no action was ever taken, does this potentially suggest that the entire dispute is not WP:DUE for mention because it didn't actually result in any lasting impact and there was only that one story on a not very notable/reliable news source? (obviously, do mind my COI wrt Kiwi Farms, the client in question of Incognet's that prompted the transit ban) lizthegrey (talk) 11:08, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- A reasonable point Atrivo (talk) 13:50, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Newquist Group for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newquist Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
The article Care acuity has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
AI-generated, OAICITE in Diff/1349137296. Article is too old for draftification.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.
If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 08:35, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Atrivo, you removed the PROD tag (which in and of itself is okay as the message above says) in Diff/1350253169 with the edit summary
modifications made to address
, but in the previous edit you saidonly the final edit seemed to spark concern
in the edit summary and that is incorrect. The problem with the article was not some specific part or section of it, the problem is that it was generated using AI, in contravention to the WP:NOLLM guideline. What I pointed out in the PROD tag is merely a symptom, it is not the problem itself. Someone else has since changed the article into a redirect, so this problem is now moot, but I wanted to remind you of the NOLLM guideline and ask if you could commit to stop using AI for your contributions to English Wikipedia? We are not allowed to add AI-generated content to the wiki, and I am worried that you might get blocked if you continue. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 12:21, 25 April 2026 (UTC)- Going forward I will make sure my contributions are based on direct review and manual summarization of reliable sources in line with English Wikipedia expectations. I wish I had thought of integrating it as part of the larger nursing topic at the time although I am somewhat unclear on how the AI-generation ban is being applied if essentially the same text is acceptable once merged elsewhere. Atrivo (talk) 14:40, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing that out, Atrivo. I went and took a closer look at the merge; looks like Klbrain rewrote the first sentence, and deleted the "Behavioral and mental health care" and "Relationship to levels of care" sections, but left the rest. I went and removed AI-generated text: Diff/1351036484. Reworked it and kept the sentence that was already rewritten by Klbrain, trimming the whole thing down to one paragraph. You are absolutely correct though, the NOLLM guideline does prohibit including AI-generated text anywhere, and the text was not acceptable in the Nursing assessment article either. Thanks for pointing this out and thanks for agreeing to stop using AI on English Wikipedia, I really do appreciate it. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 15:30, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Going forward I will make sure my contributions are based on direct review and manual summarization of reliable sources in line with English Wikipedia expectations. I wish I had thought of integrating it as part of the larger nursing topic at the time although I am somewhat unclear on how the AI-generation ban is being applied if essentially the same text is acceptable once merged elsewhere. Atrivo (talk) 14:40, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
April 2026
[edit]
Hello, I'm Gurkubondinn. An edit that you recently made to Care acuity seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 08:36, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 25
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Streynsham Master, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sati was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:52, 25 October 2026 (UTC)