Jump to content

user talk:consarn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 27 days ago by Yojo98 in topic October 2026

"do wrong right", my mommy used to say. this probably meant "if you're here to vandalize wikis, at least make it funny, you filthy casual"

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Thank you for a genuinely excellent, humorous, and pertinent deconstruction of Larry Sanger's Nine Theses. You put all my concerns into words I couldn't articulate, with your usual dose of wit and sarcasm. qcne (talk) 09:06, 4 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Yes indeed, I was coming here to give you a barnstar for that but noticed that you considered east Peru a place had already received one. Your post was quite a pleasant read but the humor did not muddle the meaning a bit. Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 06:52, 5 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
danke (or whatever it is they say in italy) to you three~
admittedly, some sections... kind of needed humor to work? that entire section in comic sans is only written like that because i couldn't get the meaning across without way too many words or muddling its impact otherwise, for example consarn (talck) (contirbuton s) 10:03, 5 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Just so you know, Breitbart did an article (can't link it 'cause blacklist) about the Larry situation which mentions you. I figured you would probably want to be aware of that. For what it's worth, I thought your dissection was well-written and quite accurate, and I will note that the author of the piece was previously banned by the community and seemingly holds a grudge against Wikipedia. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:32, 9 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
"Editor 'consarn' launched into a lengthy tirade filled with deranged mockery, arrogantly claiming Sanger didn't know what 'theses' meant by falsely insisting it referred strictly to academic papers", huh...
what can i really say about that, except... hell yeah, i'm notable now, where's my article that only i will be able to edit?
really nice of him to acknowledge the superiority of lowercase letters when referring to me, too. i think i like this adler guy
jokes aside, i love and hate that it only actually comments on the first paragraph, meaning that whether or not he's actually read it past that point is up for debate. maybe i should ask him consarn (talck) (contirbuton s) 16:47, 9 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
For those of us coming late to the party, could you provide a link to this masterpiece? Pretty please with a cherry on top? Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 03:49, 20 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
here consarn (talck) (contirbuton s) 11:10, 20 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Unconstructive talk page comments

[edit]

While I feel like a lot of the non sequiturs in your talk page comments aren't particularly conducive to the discussion, ones like this are flat out unconstructive. Please don't bog down discussions with stuff like that. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 19:29, 23 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

aye consarn (talck) (contirbuton s) 20:56, 23 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

remember to be wise

[edit]

it's a new month and the wisdom of the month is now old, outdated wisdom, we need fresh wisdom from the fount of the greatest philosopher named consarn else we will all wither and perish in ignorance anyway yeah caesar (it/he) (talky place) (united bestowals) 22:03, 1 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

i was busy :( consarn (talck) (contirbuton s) 18:19, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Results in article KineMaster nominated for deletion: restored

[edit]

Consarn, please check back on my undeletion request at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion#KineMaster. Do not re-nominate the article above or else I would get involved in the re-nomination for deletion. ~2026-78104-0 (talk) 01:09, 4 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

thanks for bringing it to my attention, but i'd actually already noticed the restoration back when it happened... and wound up doing nothing about it because i was asleep 3 minutes after the fact. oops?
a threat of participating in an afd is not going to actually prevent an afd, especially when no reason has been provided to undelete that wouldn't be better off used to draftify consarn (talck) (contirbuton s) 01:55, 4 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Heh

[edit]

"...a deep misunderstanding of so many facets of reality...". Wow. Well said! David10244 (talk) 04:07, 6 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

The_Daylight_Award

[edit]

please kindly assist me , i need help to complete the nomination process step 3 and 4 of wikipedia article for deletion process , please is urgent now Samat lib (talk) 13:28, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

ignoring that contacting some rando for this is strange to say the least, i'll try g6ing the whole thing, at which point you should activate twinkle (accessible from the preferences menu, under "gadgets") and try it again yourself; the options will be there for you consarn (talk beige) (count ribs) 13:34, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

ok if you cant fix the step 2 and 3 , then stop reverting the article i already nominated for deletionSamat lib (talk) 14:22, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

it was steps 3 and 4, where you've only done step 2 right, and step 4 doesn't exist. going on with the process as is will result in other people having to deal with a nomination so broken that it will take less effort to start from scratch with a gadget. you don't seem to have read any of the information i've provided, so please try doing that consarn (talk beige) (count ribs) 14:26, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Moon Child references

[edit]

Hi. I have just been editing the draft for Moon Child to make it different from the deleted article. I rewrote the sentences from scratch, expanded the infobox and created separate sections for "Development", "Release", "Reception" and "Resurgence". I also added the following references, courtesy of Roberth Martinez (he said, "Those are pretty much all of them talking about Moon Child in one way or another."):

  • Seven, Metin (December 28, 2002). "The Team Hoi saga • a true story". Metin Seven. Archived from the original on June 25, 2003. Retrieved February 25, 2025. Seven, Metin (December 25, 2007). "Hoi Saga". Metin Seven. Archived from the original on October 27, 2007. Retrieved February 25, 2025.
  • Drews, Alexander; Busse, Christian (September 2008). "Interview Metin Seven". Amiga Future. No. 74. APC&TCP. pp. 16–17. (interview)
  • Froholt, Joachim (September 8, 2016). "Interview with Metin Seven and Reinier van Vliet of Team Hoi". Spillhistorie. Archived from the original on September 13, 2018. Retrieved February 25, 2025. (interview)
  • Glas, Thomas (January 1998). "Made in Holland: Valkieser". Power Unlimited. No. 59. VNU Media. p. 39. Retrieved June 19, 2026. (coverage)
  • Seven, Metin (January 13, 2021). "Team Hoi games". Metin Seven. Archived from the original on January 23, 2021. Retrieved June 19, 2026.
  • Jan (July 16, 2021). "Interview: Achter de schermen bij Team Hoi". PressPlayOnTape. Archived from the original on July 16, 2021. Retrieved February 25, 2025. (interview)
  • Person, Chris (April 20, 2026). "After All These Years, it's Moon Child". Aftermath. Archived from the original on April 20, 2026. Retrieved April 29, 2026. (coverage)
  • Michonski, John (April 20, 2026). "The Second Life of Moon Child – A Conversation with Metin Seven". Gamesline. Archived from the original on April 21, 2026. Retrieved April 29, 2026. (interview)
  • "Niews: Tweede OZ Happening". Amiga Magazine. No. 23. Uitgeverij Divo. September 1993. p. 6. Retrieved June 19, 2026. (mentions "AGA Amiga" and "Team Hoi")
  • Seven, Metin (November 1993). "Return To Oz: Levende Legendes Live!". Amiga Magazine. No. 24. Uitgeverij Divo. p. 62. Retrieved June 19, 2026.

I also found these references on my own:

In the draft, the Amiga Magazine and Future references have quotes from the magazines; Amiga Magazines 24-25 mention that Moon Child was being made as an unofficial sequel to Hoi, and Amiga Future mentions Team Hoi's issues with unpaid royalties and the reason for the game's switch from Amiga to Windows. Is this draft okay to submit for review now? Bladerunner09 (talk) 22:00, 21 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Re: larry

[edit]

Re this comment: don't take his bait.

And just so you know: I'm not going to defend such clear and obvious trolling. His behavior post-block is simply abhorrent. To say that I am disappointed by this would be an understatement. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 14:43, 22 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

it's more a notice that "threat no good". procedural stuff, really, i'm not sure how he intends on making himself look good with that consarn (talk beige) (count ribs) 14:44, 22 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

your user page is awesome

[edit]

I was rummaging through the wikipedia namespace and i came across your user page, it's silly, it's funny, and it's fun to read ~2026-35622-93 (talk) 19:53, 22 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

my condolences for bumping into the dark corner of wikipedia consarn (talk beige) (count ribs) 19:55, 22 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

User:Consarn

[edit]

I checked your user page a few minutes ago, then switched to the talk page, then back to your user page only to realise it completely changed during those few minutes. Yellowmarkers (talk) 20:30, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

should've happened earlier, but i was busy cleaning my house and sleeping consarn (talk beige) (count ribs) 20:31, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Archax (September 24)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Dafootballguy, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to be a duplicate of an existing article. Wikipedia does not permit multiple articles on the same topic.
  • To improve the existing article, please edit it directly at Archax. If the article is protected and you cannot edit it, propose your changes on the article's talk page.
  • If you are writing about a different subject with the same name, ask the reviewer to rename your draft to distinguish it.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Archax to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

In solidarity, Dafootballguy (Want to talk?) 21:15, 24 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Consarn!

Having a draft declined at Articles for creation can be disappointing, but don't be discouraged, it's common when creating your first article.

Need help?

  • To understand why your draft was declined, please read the reviewer's feedback and follow any links to help pages you've been given. If you're still confused, try asking for advice at the Articles for creation Help desk.

Ur post on other user page

[edit]

I noticed same thing, they're globally locked but exempted on "home wiki" (presumably enwiki). Idk how the script works but maybe can't account for that nuance grapesurgeon (talk) 14:53, 4 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

locks don't affect the script. it took a good 20 minutes for my tiny baby idiot dumbass stupid fuckwit denthead rfk brain to piece together that it was a global block instead as of seeing this, whoops consarn (talk beige) (count ribs) 11:14, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Common 4kids edits

[edit]

Hey consarn, just a note to be more considerate with your wording when nominating RfDs. There was little need to put "for some fucking reason" in big bold-italic letters, and it seems this did cause some offense to the redirector. I'd recommend that you not ascribe any ulterior motive to these types of redirects, it's usually sufficient to explain why you think the redirect should be deleted. – Epicgenius (talk) 14:26, 12 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

October 2026

[edit]

Information icon Hi Consarn! I noticed that you recently made an edit at SiIvaGunner and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Yojo98 (talk) 18:01, 15 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

i actually marked that one as minor by accident, whoops consarn (talk beige) (count ribs) 18:29, 15 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
all good! thanks! Yojo98 (talk) 19:35, 15 October 2026 (UTC)Reply