User talk:Consequentlycomposed29
Add topicProblems with upload of File:GFiber.svg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:GFiber.svg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
"๐ซ" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect ๐ซ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 27 ยง ๐ซ until a consensus is reached. Cremastra (talk) 16:49, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
"๐ซ" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect ๐ซ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 12 ยง ๐ซ until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 17:25, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
"๐ง๐ฟโ๐ฉฐ" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect ๐ง๐ฟโ๐ฉฐ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 20 ยง ๐ง๐ฟโ๐ฉฐ until a consensus is reached. Clovermoss๐ (talk) 02:09, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
"๐ง๐พโ๐ฉฐ" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect ๐ง๐พโ๐ฉฐ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 20 ยง ๐ง๐พโ๐ฉฐ until a consensus is reached. Clovermoss๐ (talk) 02:10, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
"๐ง๐ฝโ๐ฉฐ" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect ๐ง๐ฝโ๐ฉฐ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 20 ยง ๐ง๐ฝโ๐ฉฐ until a consensus is reached. Clovermoss๐ (talk) 02:10, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
"๐ง๐ผโ๐ฉฐ" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect ๐ง๐ผโ๐ฉฐ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 20 ยง ๐ง๐ผโ๐ฉฐ until a consensus is reached. Clovermoss๐ (talk) 02:11, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
"๐ง๐ปโ๐ฉฐ" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect ๐ง๐ปโ๐ฉฐ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 20 ยง ๐ง๐ปโ๐ฉฐ until a consensus is reached. Clovermoss๐ (talk) 02:11, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
"๐ง๐ปโ๐ซฏโ๐ง๐ผ" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect ๐ง๐ปโ๐ซฏโ๐ง๐ผ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 20 ยง ๐ง๐ปโ๐ซฏโ๐ง๐ผ until a consensus is reached. Clovermoss๐ (talk) 02:11, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of ๐ง๐ปโ๐ซฏโ๐ง๐ผ
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on ๐ง๐ปโ๐ซฏโ๐ง๐ผ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 20#๐ง๐ปโ๐ซฏโ๐ง๐ผ]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zzz plant (talk) 01:47, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
"๐ซ" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect ๐ซ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 28 ยง ๐ซ until a consensus is reached. Xeroctic (talk) 21:55, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
"๐" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect ๐ to the page Tidal wave has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 24 ยง ๐ until a consensus is reached. โMyceteae๐ (talk) 14:56, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
๐ฝ
[edit]Hi, @Consequentlycomposed29: Do you understand that Wikipedia is a encyclopedia, not a blog nor forum. scope_creepTalk 19:08, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
September 2026
[edit] Hello, I'm Scope creep. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to ๐, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page, which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thanks. scope_creepTalk 19:10, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
- @Scope creep I fail to understand how these are not constructive edits? Their transient emoji meanings are indeed reflected in the current redirects (a literal melon, grapes, etc.), but not the slang meaning(s) noted in Wiktionary. So exactly like you said, it is an encyclopedia, so I would like some closure as to why redirecting these select emoji with various contextual meanings to Wiktionary is not the move here. Especially where the literal page does not note such meaning, or there doesn't exist a specific page that denotes their meaning as Wiktionary does. For example, someone searching "๐" (a grape emoji) is typically aware that it represents a grape, or grapes, but wouldn't immediately understand the slang meaning interpreted on it via social media, which is covered again, on Wiktionary, and a very brief mention on Algospeak. Consequentlycomposed29 (talk) 19:20, 3 September 2026 (UTC)