User talk:CopyleftEverything
Add topic
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Third wave of autocratization on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 00:30, 16 October 2026 (UTC)
The Troubles contentious topic notice
[edit]
You have recently made edits related to the Troubles. This is a standard message to inform you that the Troubles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:40, 22 October 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for the notice. :) CopyleftEverything (talk) 12:40, 22 October 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 24
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of mayors of Billings, Montana, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nonpartisan was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:37, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
Soldier F
[edit]Hi, the RfC has been open for two weeks now. Surely that's long enough. With the score at 13/8, or 61.5%, it should be closed with a consensus achieved (if you want to ask for someone on the RfC page to do so). Remove this conversation if you like. Cheers Billsmith60 (talk) 20:24, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
- Hi @Billsmith60: IMO it's best to wait for an uninvolved editor/admin, especially because WP:NOTVOTE -- the closer has to weigh the arguments, not just the yes/no count. :) 21:18, 30 October 2026 (UTC) CopyleftEverything (talk) 21:18, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Are you going to answer for this?
[edit]https://x.com/AshleyRindsberg/status/2117272304514175370 ~2026-53873-81 (talk) 16:57, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
- If you have an issue with their edits on El-Sayed's page, bring it to the talk page there or create an account, build up a 30/500 edit history, and edit El-Sayed's page directly using reliable sources. Wikipedia editors are not required to reply to random Twitter users. Catboy69 (talk) 17:23, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
- LOOK WHAT WE HAVE HERE ~2026-58319-31 (talk) 03:26, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 7
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Party for Socialism and Liberation, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nonpartisan was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 7 November 2026 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi CopyleftEverything. Thank you for your work on History of the Conservative Party of New York State. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for your work on this article. Please note that the New York Post is not considered a reliable source (see WP:NYPOST). Please find better sources for these claims. Please also fix the error in footnote 3. Thanks and have a great day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Mariamnei ⌠reach out đď¸ 10:33, 9 November 2026 (UTC)
- Hi @Mariamnei: Agreed! There are worse sources in that page (like Our Campaigns), it's just a near-copy of the existing "History" section of Conservative Party of New York State (which had many terrible sources). CopyleftEverything (talk) 13:26, 9 November 2026 (UTC)