Jump to content

User talk:HelloGrandGuy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 hour ago by HelloGrandGuy in topic November 2026

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, HelloGrandGuy!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, OnlyNano 20:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your article: Sinac

[edit]

Hey there! I noticed you're starting off your journey on Wikipedia by creating an article, which I saw (Sinac). That's really exciting! If you need any help with the article (I will help with contributions as well, as it seems like an interesting place), please shoot me a message on my talk page, and I will respond as soon as possible! OnlyNano 20:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello HelloGrandGuy! Your additions to Draft:Almissani have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:12, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

can you tell me where the copyrighted material is so i can remove it? thank you! HelloGrandGuy (talk) 19:30, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I deleted the version that had the copyvio. The currect version does not appear to have any copyright issues. — Diannaa (talk) 19:34, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Almissani (June 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 19:18, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, HelloGrandGuy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 19:18, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
can you please tell me the specific details on how to expand my article for it to get accepted on wikipedia HelloGrandGuy (talk) 20:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@HelloGrandGuy you have a single primary source, that does not prove the company meets our notability requirements for organisations.
The entire draft is also a thinly disguised advert for the company, which is prohibited on Wikipedia.
Are you employed by the company, perchance? Qcne (talk) 09:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
i will add more sources thank you for that
and no not at all im an independent writer HelloGrandGuy (talk) 20:27, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Mladen Marušić moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Mladen Marušić. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Waqar💬 13:48, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

well the source i have is the son of mladen marušić i dont know what else you need because theres only 1 or 2 sources that i can link in the article HelloGrandGuy (talk) 16:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mladen Marušić (November 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
We'd need a few more sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 21:41, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
how many sources HelloGrandGuy (talk) 18:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Our standard is three independent sources @HelloGrandGuy. As long as they are published they can be offline (such as books). Qcne (talk) 18:27, 3 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Almissani

[edit]

Information icon Hello, HelloGrandGuy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Almissani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mladen Marušić (December 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:ANYBIO, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. Forums and blogsites are not acceptable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 03:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Almissani

[edit]

Hello, HelloGrandGuy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Almissani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:50, 16 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Mladen Marušić

[edit]

Information icon Hello, HelloGrandGuy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mladen Marušić, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 13 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Mladen Marušić

[edit]

Hello, HelloGrandGuy. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mladen Marušić".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 19:25, 11 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

April 2026

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Realtent. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2026 Shreveport, Louisiana, shooting, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Realtent (talk) 21:08, 19 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Pretty stupid how you just reverted it other than you adding a citation for the already correct information which could be easily googled, but whatever sure. HelloGrandGuy (talk) 16:21, 25 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
As per WP:BURDEN: "The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material" which would be you. Also, please don't call me stupid. Realtent (talk) 16:30, 25 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
I had no intention to be rude or to call you (other than your actions) stupid, and i would like to apologize if i seemed rude, thank you for the clarification though i'll be sure to add citations in the future. HelloGrandGuy (talk) 19:00, 26 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zrinski Topolovac shooting, links pointing to the disambiguation pages Aftermath and Zastava M70 were added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 30 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of 2021 Šibenik & Vodice Shooting

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 2021 Šibenik & Vodice Shooting requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications is prohibited on Wikipedia. For further information, see section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. Fortek67 (talk) 16:39, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

The use of LLMs (AI) is prohibited on Wikipedia. To make things easier, please admit whether or not you did use AI to generate the article. Fortek67 (talk) 16:41, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
I would like to deeply apologize if the article i made seems AI generated, i admit i do use artificial intelligence for a blueprint on how the page should look like along with linking some references (cause i am new on wikipedia), but in no way have i ever copy pasted material made by artificial intelligence. Id advise considering on reversing the "speedy deletion" of the page, or atleast telling me what part of my writing style seems AI generated HelloGrandGuy (talk) 16:48, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hi, thanks for admitting. Articles should be published in your own words. Now, to give you another chance, I have drafted the article to Draft:2021 Šibenik & Vodice Shooting per WP:DRAFTIFY. You may complete significant improvements and cleanups to the article, were you can than resubmit via AfC (I have added a button at the top of the page). Any questions, don't hesitate to ask. Thank you. Fortek67 (talk) 16:56, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
I cant seem to understand the term "orphan" why was my article listed as one and how do i not make it an orphan HelloGrandGuy (talk) 16:57, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
An orphan is when no other articles link to said article. Making it not an orphan is simple. Just add links in other articles that link to the article. Honestly since it's now a draft, don't worry about it until it gets accepted and moved to the article space. Fortek67 (talk) 17:18, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Does it count if it was in a category? HelloGrandGuy (talk) 17:56, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
No Fortek67 (talk) 17:57, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Split shooting reference

[edit]

Hi, in this edit you added a reference as follows:

<ref>{{Cite web |title=Enable JavaScript to use search |url=https://www.google.com/httpservice/retry/enablejs?sei=PLU6arGvEtDk5NoP_ID16AE |access-date=2026-06-23 |website=www.google.com}}</ref>

This is a google search error page. I do not believe there is any way of reconstructing the search. Do you think you could perhaps replace it with whatever non-search source you had meant to use? Morwen (talk) 20:23, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi thanks for doing that - can you try the new link you supplied again though? It gives a 404 error for me - and I tried googling for the article title and can't find it either. Morwen (talk) 22:30, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Accidentally put the wrong link for the second time in a row, i think this should work now. HelloGrandGuy (talk) 08:42, 24 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Podvinje cafe shooting, a link pointing to the disambiguation page IED was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 21 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:2021 Šibenik & Vodice Shooting has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2021 Šibenik & Vodice Shooting. Thanks! Kovcszaln6 (talk) 09:19, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2021 Šibenik & Vodice Shooting (August 24)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Timtrent, left the following feedback:
This draft is not written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove: Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.
Contains WP:OR

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:2021 Šibenik & Vodice Shooting to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 15:21, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I swear i made the article as neutral as possible HelloGrandGuy (talk) 16:14, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on 2020 St. Mark's Square shooting

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2020 St. Mark's Square shooting, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use placeholder names, or the name of the newspaper or organisation, instead of the source's actual author or editor name. If no human author is given, the fields should be removed. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
    • News, Total Croatia (2020-10-12). "Who is Danijel Bezuk? Zagreb Shooter was 22 Years Old, from Kutina". Total Croatia. Retrieved 2026-09-06. {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)
    • News, Total Croatia (2020-10-13). "Police Director: No Prior Indication Shooting on St. Mark's Square Might Occur". Total Croatia. Retrieved 2026-09-06. {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:05, 6 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 St. Mark's Square shooting, a link pointing to the disambiguation page N1 was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 6 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Daruvar shooting

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Daruvar shooting, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:09, 18 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

November 2026

[edit]

Information icon Hi HelloGrandGuy! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Raskuly 🐰 19:59, 13 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

thanks didnt know HelloGrandGuy (talk) 21:19, 13 November 2026 (UTC)Reply