User talk:Help.Football.History

Hello, Help.Football.History, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia.

First of all, why me? And second of all, it is done: Template:Campeonato Regional Centro.

I have set to myself the challenge of spending the whole month of March exclusively creating wiki pages (as you can see on my contributions); fortunately I am now creating your talk page, but after this, I can only talk to you in April (sorry), so I am going to try to help you as much as I can now.

In order to create pages, you need to click on the red links (for example, 1904 Campeonato de Madrid or 1939 Campeonato Mancomunado Centro) write the article and then publish it. If you are unable to do it, it's because you account is too recent (I think you have to wait around 5 days). Until then, you can keep doing small edits or perhaps expand the history section of the Campeonato Regional Centro (this page also exists in the Spanish Wikipedia, so you can use it for guidence).

When you start creating, I recommend you use my 1903 Campeonato de Madrid as a blue print (without the background section). Try to always find at least 3-5 references (https://www.rsssf.org/tabless/span-centrchamp.html, https://web.archive.org/web/20190819152048/http://www.leyendablanca.galeon.com/tempo04.htm, https://www.zerozero.pt/competicao/campeonato-del-centro/2929), because if you don't, they are going to delete the page for not being "notable". I know that pages such as 1928–29 Campeonato Regional Centro do not have any references, but that page was made in 2012, when the surveillance of the rules was not as strict as it is today. Before publishing a page, always check if there are no major mistakes by using this botton that says "preview".

I also recommend that you start with the 1939 Campeonato Mancomunado Centro (the result of all the matches are here: https://www.bdfutbol.com/en/c/temporada.html?id=479&tab=results), because it has more refs and because it does have his own page in the Spanish Wikipedia (here), so you can take the blueprint from there. It is also bigger than the first editions, so it will serve as a nice first challange for you.

If you have doubts, you will have to fend for yourself or wait until April. Kind regards, Barr Theo (talk) 16:30, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Barr Theo (talk) 16:30, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to 1985–86 Divizia C. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Help.Football.History. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zimbrul Siret, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:10, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to 1929–30 Campeonato Regional Centro. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 03:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done! Sorry for the delay. You must always add at least three references if you want to give your articles a better chance to stand. You now have a new blueprint for the others Campeonato Regional Centro. You can even elaborate on important matches as an excuse to add more references and make the article look better.

By the way, I am glad that my biggest fan has stuck around. I would also like to thank you for all of the edits that you make on my creations. They might be small, but are just as important because they usually correct the mistakes that I leave behind during the haste of my streaks. I should have thanked you for this back in May, but I just never did.

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date.

Kind regards. Barr Theo (talk) 15:17, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

1905 Copa del Rey final

added a link pointing to Antonio Alonso

1906 Copa del Rey

added a link pointing to Antonio Alonso

1906 Copa del Rey final

added a link pointing to Antonio Alonso

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to 1905 Campeonato de Madrid. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:37, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Help.Football.History

I edit here too, under the username Toadspike and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Coupe Dewar, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 15 § Coupe Dewar.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Toadspike}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Toadspike [Talk] 12:24, 15 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi Help.Football.History. Thank you for your work on André Durbec. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

"André" isn't mentioned in the target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:48, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

You have been constantly following me for over a year now. Always correcting my tiny little mistakes and creating redirects to my articles. You are surely my No. 1 fan, and I just want you to know that your work is much appreciated. I will take a closer look at Zimbrul Siret tomorrow.

Kind regards. Barr Theo (talk) 02:10, 1 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi Help.Football.History. Thank you for your work on Francisco Torréns. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

the francisco mentioned in the target page has a different last name

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:39, 1 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

1905 Campeonato de Madrid, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 18:45, 8 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello again friend, can you help to don`t let the article to be deleted? Someone wants to delete all the articles of Campeonato de Madrid or Campeonato Centro, they are not mady by AI! Please, do something! and help me get unblocked! Help.Football.History (talk) 21:13, 3 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Help. I turned one of your many redirects (Juan Ochoa) into a disambiguation. Kind regards. Luis7M (talk) 16:06, 16 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1988–89 Nemzeti Bajnokság II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BVSC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 2 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1906 Campeonato de Madrid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1906 Campeonato de Madrid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Govvy (talk) 09:26, 3 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Greenman. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Highlanders F.C., but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Greenman (talk) 20:26, 8 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

https://www.rsssf.org/tablesz/zimbcuphist.html I did provide a ref. Can you help improve the Cup of Zimbabwe article? Thank you! Help.Football.History (talk) 20:38, 8 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to CS Zimbrul Siret. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and multiple issues from the AfC reviews remain unresolved. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:40, 24 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Real Stadium Club Ovetense, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:34, 25 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Real Stadium Club Ovetense. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 06:03, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 1935–36 Campeonato Mancomunado Castilla-Aragón, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:30, 28 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 1934–35 Campeonato Mancomunado Castilla-Aragón, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:35, 28 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 1934–35 Madrid FC season, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:35, 28 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Campeonato Regional Centro, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:10, 30 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Somali First Division, a link pointing to the disambiguation page MCC was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:14, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello Help.Football.History! Your additions to Galician Championship have been removed in whole or in part, because they contained copyright violations. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, we take copyright very seriously. You cannot copy text from your sources. Everything you contribute needs to be written in your own words, and avoid too close paraphrasing. If you own the copyright of the content you want to use, please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.

Continuing to violate our copyright policy may lead you to be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:20, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Thanks for considering me the best Romanian football editor.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Castilla-León Championship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castilla-León Championship until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Axolitl (talk | contribs) 00:23, 1 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

• Castilla y León Cup and Castilla-León Championship are 2 separate entities (Cup & League). The Championship is the main competition which is the qualification for Copa del Rey.

  Here is the list with all Regional Championships: {{Copa del Rey}} Each regional championship should have the own page.

Help.Football.History (talk) 06:36, 1 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Each regional championship should have the own page. No article "should" have a page unless they meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 22:49, 1 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Castilla-León Championship and Castilla y León Cup are two separate entities. Castilla-León Championship has reliable sources, as well secondary sources and meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. What do you think is missing from the article? Help.Football.History (talk) 05:18, 2 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

In order for an article to be notable, numerous independent, reliable sources must cover the subject in detail. Databases generally don't contribute to this, and nor do statistic-websites. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 05:49, 2 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

In this case database contribute in detail about each edition. rsssf.org and bdfutbol.com are reliable sources and cover the subject in detail. Castilla-León Championship is the qualification tournament for Copa del Rey and as you see in the template, each region has a qualification tournament. Help.Football.History (talk) 19:27, 2 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Instead of telling me this here, why don't you participate in the deletion discussion? Axolitl (talk | contribs) 01:40, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. See WP:WPFLINKSNO. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:37, 12 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the information! Help.Football.History (talk) 14:36, 14 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 1998 Cupa Ligii, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. As I only just explained to you, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please stop citing the website in articles. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:39, 14 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

The article 1902 Concurso de Bandas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Almost wholly sourced with WP:CIRCULAR references from Wikipedia, and not a lot of sources seem to be available online

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

TNM101 (in solidarity · chat) 14:21, 15 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I did add more refferences about the subject. How do I delete now the proposed for deletion? Help.Football.History (talk) 15:21, 15 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

I think you didn't understand my concerns with the PROD. I meant to say that you should remove every and all references in the article pointing to any-language Wikipedias. See WP:WINARS as to why.

Now coming to the bigger fish, I noticed with this diff you have added an AI-generated source. Please be honest, have you used LLM's to partly or wholly write this article? TNM101 (in solidarity · chat) 15:48, 15 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

I removed every and all references in the article pointing to any-language Wikipedias. Help.Football.History (talk) 17:28, 15 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Are you still here? You have not addressed my concerns about the potential LLM-use TNM101 (in solidarity · chat) 15:50, 17 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

I don`t use LLM. I preffer to read and document each article, because I am a football supporter. Help.Football.History (talk) 21:56, 17 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi--please put that on the user's talk page. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 20:50, 16 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, thank you! and maybe you can also help create some new pages about stadiums or football clubs or others! Thank you! Help.Football.History (talk) 20:54, 16 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Grapesurgeon, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Too many WP:PRIMARY sources; needs more secondary coverage

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Real Stadium Club Ovetense to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

grapesurgeon (talk) 12:43, 18 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

I don't recall making any modifications on that particular article. Do what needs to be done to keep the article decent. VJFlow2018 (talk) 14:29, 19 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cantabrian Championship, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basque Country was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 24 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Help.Football.History,

Thank you for creating 1979–80 Kategoria e Dytë.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Tagging for potential copyright violation per WP:COPYVIO. See diff.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|AriuCH}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

AriuCH (talk) 21:58, 28 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Sporting Club Tenerife. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:49, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for using LLMs to write articles (such as Draft:Sporting Club Tenerife) after being warned about Wikipedia's policy. You have been blocked from adding AI-generated content directly to articles to prevent further disruption.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page. Alternatively, add the following text directly to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:54, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:AI noticeboard regarding an AI cleanup investigation which may be related to you. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:21, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Iberia Tenerife. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:03, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Africa Sport Club. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:43, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Real Unión Deportiva. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:43, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to CD Español de Valladolid. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:44, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Real Club Victoria. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:45, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Marino FC. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:51, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Trofeo Euskadi Asegarce. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:25, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to RCD Extremeño. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:28, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Extremadura Championship. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:29, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Cupa Primăverii. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:33, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to 1994 Cupa Ligii. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:34, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to 1902 Concurso de Bandas. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:37, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Help.Football.History (block log · active blocks · global blocks · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · creation log · change block settings · unblock · checkuser (log) · SI)

---

Request reason:

I would like to request that my block be reconsidered. I understand that adding AI-generated content to Wikipedia was a mistake, especially when the material was not sufficiently verified and did not meet Wikipedia's standards for sourcing and reliability. I take responsibility for this. I would like to be unblocked because I genuinely want to continue contributing to Wikipedia, particularly by improving articles about historical football clubs and competitions. I am willing to work within Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and to make sure that information is independently verified using reliable, non-Wikipedia sources before I add it to an article. If I am given another opportunity to edit, I will not simply copy and paste AI-generated text. I will treat any AI assistance, if used at all, only as a drafting aid and will personally verify every factual claim against appropriate sources before submitting it. I am also willing to correct or remove any previous content that does not meet Wikipedia's standards. I understand why the previous edits caused concern, and I would appreciate the opportunity to demonstrate that I can contribute constructively and responsibly. Help.Football.History (talk) 21:27, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You were warned about this and decided to try to mislead us about your use of AI. Multiple tools tell me this unblock request was written by AI. I'm going to extend your block site-wide. Yamla (talk) 21:32, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yamla I am sorry Yamla, I will only edit with responsability from now, can you help me unblock me please? Thank you!Help.Football.History

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Help.Football.History (block log · active blocks · global blocks · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · creation log · change block settings · unblock · checkuser (log) · SI)

---

Request reason:

I understand your concern. I apologize for not being fully transparent about my use of AI assistance. I accept the warning and will make sure to follow Wikipedia's rules going forward. I would appreciate the opportunity to regain your trust rather than receive a site-wide block. Help.Football.History (talk) 21:39, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Repeatedly using LLMs to make unblock requests after being blocked for <checks notes> misuse of LLMs is a bold strategy that will only work out in moving you rapidly towards removal of your talk page access. Do not do it again. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:55, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The Bushranger I understand The Bushranger, but I should do now to can edit again. For how long time I have to wait?Help.Football.History (talk) 17:43, 22 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

What do I do now? I read the Wikipedia policy and I am ready to be back and help the comunity! (The Reply button does not work) Thank you!Help.Football.History (talk) 14:10, 19 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Help.Football.History (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I read the Wikipedia policy and I am ready to be back and help the comunity! What I should do now? Thank you!

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I read the Wikipedia policy and I am ready to be back and help the comunity! What I should do now? Thank you! |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I read the Wikipedia policy and I am ready to be back and help the comunity! What I should do now? Thank you! |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I read the Wikipedia policy and I am ready to be back and help the comunity! What I should do now? Thank you! |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

• Comment from blocking admin: I strongly recommend that if a reviewing admin lifts the block, they retain a mainspace block to minimize disruption until the user demonstrates knowledge of the policy through draftspace and edit requests. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:25, 19 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

I am sorry but I can`t edit my drafts, they extend my block site-wide, can you please remove it and let me start improve the drafts? Thank you! Help.Football.History (talk) 12:07, 22 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

User:Dclemens1971 For how long I have to wait until I can edit again? How should I demonstrate knowledge if I can`t edit at all? Help.Football.History (talk) 17:31, 22 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

There's no timeline for volunteer administrators to review unblock requests. Some blocked participants build up a track record of effective contributions on another language's wiki while waiting (provided they are able to read and write well in that language). Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:02, 22 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Can you be kind and review my block request. Or you can check my history of edits on different old pages and you can see how much I contributed to that pages. Or you can help public my review to other editors to see my request? because no one can see my request only on my tak page! Thank you a lot User:Dclemens1971! Help.Football.History (talk) 08:04, 23 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

User:Dclemens1971 did you forget about me, about my questions and my request? Thank you. Help.Football.History (talk) 21:00, 27 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Can you explain what Wikipedia's guidelines on LLM use say, why your previous edits were a violation of those guidelines, and how you would comply with them in future? Make sure to respond in your own words. MCE89 (talk) 13:38, 30 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

I understand now that I made mistakes by using AI to create wikipedia article instead of writting them myself. I did understand the rules now about LLM use and I realize that AI was not the right way to contribute to Wikipedia.

I take responsibility for my actions. I understand that AI generated content can contain incorrect information and unreliable references, and that every contribution must be properly verified. As well, I did write articles with my own words! many tables and redirects was done by me! I did not use AI for everything! Check Campeonato Regional Centro seasons for example! I did not use AI to make the seasons and the tables from pages! Have a look and help me to don`t get deleted!

In the future I will not use AI to write or rewrite wikipedia articles. I will do my own research; use reliable sources and write the content myself.

I am sorry for not respecting these guidelines. I hope I can have another chance to contribute to Wikipedia and regain the communitys trust. Help.Football.History (talk) 19:45, 2 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Viitorul Liteni. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:49, 30 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to 1991 Mitropa Cup. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:52, 30 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Muncitorul Cernăuți. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:54, 30 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Eclipse FC Santander. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:00, 30 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Canary Islands Championship. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:10, 30 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Cantabrian Championship. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:11, 30 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Vasconia SC. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:12, 30 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Concordia Iași. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources and it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:15, 30 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Teofil Moraru. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:16, 30 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Hatmanul Luca Arbore Rădăuți. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:16, 30 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, S0091, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate, draft, or rewrite article content.

Please delete the portions which were LLM-generated, and summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have used an LLM but you believe that your use is covered by one of the two exceptions (basic copyediting and translation between two languages in which you are fully fluent), please provide a transcript of the prompt(s) you used while writing your draft (see the how-to guide). Reviewers can make mistakes. If you have not received any LLM assistance, you may seek a second opinion at the AfC Help Desk.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Extremadura Championship to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

S0091 (talk) 15:35, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Help.Football.History (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

After receiving two talk page notices, continuing to use LLMs to compose articles (as at [[Draft:Sporting Club Tenerife]]), continuing in unblock requests

• Blocking administrator: Yamla (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: You are not autoblocked. This is not the correct template to be using for requesting that a directly be lifted. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:31, 26 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Can I make again a request or how long I have to wait until I can request an unblock? Thank you! I would appreciate if you can help me get unblock Sir! Help.Football.History (talk) 14:56, 28 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Help.Football.History (block log · active blocks · global blocks · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · creation log · change block settings · unblock · checkuser (log) · SI)

---

Request reason:

I am sorry for my behavior and excess of using AI, but from now I will use only good sources and make mostly minor football pages edits. I am a beginner editor and I still learn about Wikipedia Help.Football.History (talk) 17:55, 22 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Please only make one unblock request at a time. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:31, 26 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.