User talk:Imcdc

Thanks for uploading File:Anima Holding.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 16 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hey Imcdc, just wanted to flag the Granite Asia revert. They hold a full CMS Fund Management licence from MAS and rebranded from GGV Capital Asia in 2024 to operate as a multi-asset platform across PE, VC and private credit. Not purely VC anymore. Here's the MAS registry link if useful: https://eservices.mas.gov.sg/fid/institution/detail/225726-GRANITE-ASIA-CAPITAL-PTE-LTD Meriem Aou (talk) 11:40, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

So basically they are an alternative asset management firm. The correct lists to use are List of private equity firms and List of venture capital firms. Imcdc Contact 13:06, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hey, just wanted to drop a quick note. I'm a disclosed COI editor and should've gone through the edit request process instead of editing the article directly.. I thought just disclosing the rs I had was enough.. Lesson learned. I've put in proper edit requests on the article's talk page now, so hopefully that's the right way to go about it going forward. Genuinely didn't want to disturb, after reading your bio.. I thought you didn't like initiating edits.

thanks!! Isabella4440 (talk) 20:58, 18 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:International Organisation for Mediation.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 18 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Imcdc. I have seen you contribute to many fund-related articles, so I was wondering if you could do some basic checks if Dubai Investment Fund is genuine. The fund's website does not disclose a legal company name, incorporation jurisdiction, trade license number or company registration number. Its domain was registered only a few years ago and its media coverage is clustered in 2022 (likely paid) even though it claims to have been operating since 2001. The fund claims $320 billion AUM but there is no coverage in FT, Bloomberg, WSJ etc. DIF claims offices in over 20 countries but I have been unable to verify any of them through Google Maps.

DIF also claims to have invested in US stocks. Given the size of fund, Form 13F with the SEC every quarter is must yet I cannot find any filings on EDGAR. Also, on the website itself, there is a Telegram link. Do you think a fund of this size need Telegram push? It sounds like a fraud and has been reported as such . Your output would help us sort this. Please do share your opinion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dubai Investment Fund. Thanks for all of your work. ~2026-41708-82 (talk) 16:01, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Imcdc. I have seen you contribute to many fund-related articles, so I was wondering if you could do some basic checks if Dubai Investment Fund is genuine. The fund's website does not disclose a legal company name, incorporation jurisdiction, trade license number or company registration number. Its domain was registered only a few years ago and its media coverage is clustered in 2022 (likely paid) even though it claims to have been operating since 2001. The fund claims $320 billion AUM but there is no coverage in FT, Bloomberg, WSJ etc. DIF claims offices in over 20 countries but I have been unable to verify any of them through Google Maps.

DIF also claims to have invested in US stocks. Given the size of fund, Form 13F with the SEC every quarter is must yet I cannot find any filings on EDGAR. Also, on the website itself, there is a Telegram link. Do you think a fund of this size need Telegram push? It sounds like a fraud and has been reported as such . Your output would help us sort this. Please do share your opinion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dubai Investment Fund. Thanks for all of your work. ~2026-41511-83 (talk) 16:01, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

This possibly falls under WP:CANVASS. Imcdc Contact 01:32, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, you seem to be more experienced with Wikipedia than me, so i apologise for any mistake on my behalf. But I noticed you changed "Hunnic Wars" to "Gupta–Hunnic Wars" and added information about Chandragupta II's war with the Huns.

I would like to explain that the more common title is "Hunnic Wars", as Gupta Empire wasn't the only empire included in it, actually it was not even the major one, Aulikaras were the Major one.Indo–Hunnic Wars can work too, but Hunnic Wars is almost always associated with the Indian invasions. As in Persia their "Hunnic" wars are called Helphalite-Sassanid Wars.

Chandragupta II's war with the Huns is just a theory. It is based on identification of Raghu from Kalidasa's book as him, which is not accepted by most authors and is hence just a theory. ScrubbedSoap (talk) 13:43, 18 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

There is an Arbitration enforcement action against you for ignoring the 500 non military edit requirement for WP:CT/IMH. The administrators are already aware of your edit history. You better explain to them why you have been ignoring explicit warnings time and time again. Imcdc Contact 14:04, 18 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Okay, got it. ScrubbedSoap (talk) 15:42, 18 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Just now, you reverted an edit I made on Liang Wenfeng using RedWarn. Is there a reason behind the revert? I couldn't find any policy I was violating, so I wanted to know why. I apologize for the inconvenience.

Sincerely, 16dvnk (talk) 12:32, 26 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Apart from readability issues, there isn't anymore justification for this tag. Firstly this article is not about Deepseek. Second his wealth is already mentioned in the lead.

Tagging excessively can be considered disruptive behavior. If you really feel so strongly about it, you can feel free to add in the updates yourself. Imcdc Contact 13:15, 26 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Just a friendly reminder that normally, you should only be undoing edits with no edit summary in the case of obvious vandalism or disruptive editing. If you don't leave a summary, it leaves editors having to guess what you didn't like about the edit, so if you explain your reasoning, it saves everyone a lot of time. Maayaaaaa (talk) 08:58, 4 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

My Mistake. I misread your edit as another disruptive edit on the talk page. There have been a lot of these especially on AI related ones. Imcdc Contact 09:16, 4 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Yep, I'm working on a new template, Template:Not a chatbot. It should help cut down on the talk page spam on pages relating to AI assistants. At least, hopefully it should. Maayaaaaa (talk) 09:20, 4 October 2026 (UTC)Reply