User talk:NShehan

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Notable subject but needs checking as appears to be LLM.AI slop. The wikidata item was for an Italian actor "Benito Artesi", and the POWO source is for "Carex mabilliana". Needs checking for more LLM hallucinations the source fix and sources used for the description section and the locations found in the lead section

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Asarum shuttleworthii and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:23, 19 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi, the same with this one. I have moved Hexastylis shuttleworthii to Asarum shuttleworthii so if you would like to update now please do. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 11:28, 22 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

This one has also been merged now, thanks again to UtherSRG. KylieTastic (talk) 17:07, 22 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, NShehan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:23, 19 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Hexastylis rhombiformis instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Hexastylis rhombiformis exists as the Homotypic Synonyms for this so the correct action would be to more Hexastylis rhombiformis to Asarum rhombiformis. We normally use POWO as the key source and they use Asarum rhombiformis for the accepted name. Pinging UtherSRG and Plantdrew to check they agree we should move Hexastylis rhombiformis per POWO?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Asarum rhombiformis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 08:40, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi NShehan, thanks for your work to correct and update these to the correct name. I have moved Hexastylis rhombiformis to Asarum rhombiformis to keep the history/attribution, but it should be updated to your better version. As I'm not an administrator I can not do the move over and history merge as UtherSRG suggested, but as the history of the draft main content just comes down to the one first creation I suggest you just do a copy-paste update. I would have done it but thought I would leave to you for correct attribution of your work. Any questions just ask. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 11:24, 22 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Note that this has been merged now, thanks to UtherSRG. KylieTastic (talk) 16:50, 22 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Pityopsis aspera

added a link pointing to Morphological

Scutellaria parvula

added a link pointing to Development

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 18 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello NShehan and thank you very much for your work here.

Unfortunately, Stigmatodactylus antennatus is not an accepted species at Plants of the World Online at today's date. Perhaps if you think it should be listed there, a note to Rafaël Govaerts at [email protected] may change its listing. Gderrin (talk) 22:43, 22 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

I will follow up on this and may contact POWO regarding its status. The species was only published on 13 February 2026, so it is likely it has not yet been incorporated into their database. Thank you for bringing this to my attention! Niyan Shehan (talk) 22:48, 22 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lupinus villosus, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lupines was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi NShehan. Thank you for your work on Clematis subreticulata. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 06:53, 31 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello NShehan, Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I refer to some of the articles you created on plant species that did not include the correct categories for genus or family, such as Blephilia subnuda and Stenanthium diffusum. I would appreciate it if you could, in future, include the primary category entry along with the others. Regards. QEnigma 论 05:14, 1 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Dwayne Estes. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 07:41, 11 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your efforts creating new plant articles.

You've had several articles in multiple redundant distribution categories. E.g., Palafoxia reverchonii was in: Category:Endemic flora of Texas, Category:Endemic flora of the United States and [:Category:Flora of the United States]]. Endemic flora of Texas is the only necessary category in that case; anything that is endemic to Texas is endemic to the United States, and anything that is endemic to the United States also falls into Flora of the United States (along with non-endemic species).

There is some guidance about the distribution categories for plants at Wikipedia:WikiProject Plants/World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions. Plantdrew (talk) 16:53, 23 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eriogonum allenii, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Appalachian was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 27 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I noticed your edit to Euphorbia glyptosperma where you added a number of links to the lede of the article. There is guidance on what should be linked at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking. In particular linked terms should not be next to each other to avoid confusion for the reader. See MOS:SEAOFBLUE Part of the problem in this case is that you added links to North America and native, commonly understood terms that should not be linked in most articles. See MOS:GEOLINK and MOS:OVERLINK. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 22:54, 27 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lambertia echinata, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Recovery plan was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Category:Plants named after Timothy Field Allen has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 12:32, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bigelowia nuttallii, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Purring maggot. An edit that you recently made to Eryngium arenosum seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. ^purring_maggot (talk) 03:29, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:AI noticeboard regarding an AI cleanup investigation related to your species articles. The thread is User:NShehan. Hi NShehan, I'm not sure you've been apprised of WP:NOLLM yet, which states the use of LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is prohibited. An editor brought it to the noticeboard's attention that your species articles appear to be AI-generated, so I invite you to join the thread and explain a bit about your workflow for creating these articles so we can decide together what to do to remediate the content. Thank you! ^purring_maggot (talk) 03:36, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, NShehan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dwayne Estes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:07, 11 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, NShehan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Dwayne Estes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:37, 11 October 2026 (UTC)Reply