User talk:Per exemplum

This is Per exemplum's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Add new text under old text. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Start a new topic Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives (index): 1Auto-archiving period: 23 days

Note: I am committed to ethical conduct and always assume good faith. If you are here because you believe I made a mistake, please be courteous and make sure you consult WP:POLICYLIST before posting.

Your good article nomination of the article Group of Four Trees (Jean Dubuffet) has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Voorts -- Voorts (talk) 21:24, 1 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Let me know when you are ready to re-nominate, as I'm interested in reviewing it. Viriditas (talk) 22:00, 1 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Viriditas Thank you for offering. I've responded with my objections to qf on the review page, which I wanted to be on the record. I understand the reviewer has made up their mind, so I will definitely take you up on it. I'll ping you once it's re-nominated. Per Exemplum 18:56, 2 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

No worries. Your lead is somewhat long compared to the rest of the body. A trim for proportion might be in order, or leave it and expand the body. Something to consider? Viriditas (talk) 03:12, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello Per exemplum:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2026!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2026, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films or organizations created by women) during the event period — and this time, we are extending our focus to encourage more Did You Know (DYK) submissions spotlighting new GA articles about women and women's works. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by the event's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Alanna the Brave (talk) & Grnrchst (talk)

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 18 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

(This message was sent to User talk:Ppt91 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Hi, let's avoid edit wars on Tupac's Wikipedia page. If you want to make any changes, according to Wikipedia's rules, you should first open a discussion and reach a consensus with other editors. Let's avoid edit wars, as they have already happened in the past, and above all, let's avoid removing academic sources. Thank you. Pier1999 (talk) 06:26, 12 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Pier1999 I am not involved in any edit wars on Tupac and am not quite sure what you're referring to. If this is about the recent edits in the lead, the previous version used peacock language that was not supported by verifiable sources. Such edits don't require any additional consensus and you should not be reverting them. Per Exemplum 20:32, 12 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism

Frankly, I don't want to argue with you. I've already figured out what I need to do. We can discuss this now, but if you continue to deny the facts despite the sources presented, I'll be forced to report you to the administrators. My arguments are based exclusively on academic sources, which support everything I'm saying. It clearly states: "One of the most influential musicians of the 20th century." It's written explicitly by a prominent academic. We can discuss this and resolve the issue, but if you keep editing the biography and removing those sources, I'll have no choice but to involve the administrators.

Those sources have already been accepted, and they contain no peacock language whatsoever. These are statements that are explicitly supported by the sources. So, let's resolve this now. Pier1999 (talk) 00:23, 13 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Pasting below what I said on your talk page. Your conduct is becoming very disruptive and I am not going to engage with you anymore.

You seem to have little understanding of how Wikipedia works. Administrators don't approve of anything; this encyclopedia is built on sourcing. The current phrasing ("Shakur is regarded as one of the greatest and most influential rappers of all time") acknowledges his influence and is supported with a list of claims from multiple reliable sources. His interest in social injustice is likewise mentioned in the same paragraph. I am not even quite sure what is it that you're trying to argue or what the problem is, but you need to stop. Your talk page is filled with people trying to tell you to take a step back, follow the rules, and engage in constructive editing.

Per Exemplum 00:42, 13 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

There are some comments about me on my page concerning things that happened in the past, but they have nothing to do with Tupac. Those were exclusively related to edits concerning how certain roles, such as "artist", "activist" were described in article leads.

As for what you're saying, another user tried to do exactly what you're doing now, repeatedly editing Tupac's biography, and was eventually banned. This happened two years ago. That user also tried to remove those sources.

I've already reported you, and I have no intention of discussing this with you any further. Let's wait for the moderators or administrators to address the situation. Pier1999 (talk) 00:53, 13 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

I've reported you for vandalism because there are plenty of reliable sources supporting those statements, but you seem determined to downplay Tupac's significance. This has happened many times before with other users, who were eventually banned. I'm sorry, but we already had problems with another user two years ago. Pier1999 (talk) 00:28, 13 October 2026 (UTC)Reply