User talk:QuaintCable
Add topicWelcome
[edit]
|
Eric Dickerson (American football coach) moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Eric Dickerson (American football coach), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 15:27, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Eric Dickerson (American football coach)
[edit]
Hello, QuaintCable. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eric Dickerson (American football coach), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Eric Dickerson (American football coach)
[edit]
Hello, QuaintCable. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eric Dickerson".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:36, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Nocturne (software) (December 14)
[edit]
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nocturne (software) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 |
Hello, QuaintCable!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tesleemah (talk) 09:30, 14 December 2024 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Nocturne (software) has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Ca talk to me! 10:12, 15 December 2024 (UTC)ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ameena Soliman (October 7)
[edit]- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Ameena Soliman to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi QuaintCable. Thank you for your work on April Cook. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice start!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi QuaintCable. Thank you for your work on Jessica Bichler. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice start!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi QuaintCable. Thank you for your work on Seth Woodall. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice start!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi QuaintCable. Thank you for your work on Janene Ackles. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice start!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi QuaintCable. Thank you for your work on Caroline Eason. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice start!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi QuaintCable. Thank you for your work on Mark Carver. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice start!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi QuaintCable. Thank you for your work on Chris Bishopp. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice start!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
28 new articles on 4 Nov 2026
[edit]While on New Page Patrol, I noticed the plethora (28!) of politician biographies you created within 2.5 hours on Nov 4. An amazing feat, yes, but makes me curious regarding the possibility of ai-generated content. For example, each article has multiple very recent references regarding the Nov 2 election. Fleshed-out infoboxes, tables, templates, etc. are included throughout. --Rosiestep (talk) 09:09, 5 November 2026 (UTC)
- @Rosiestep: Thanks for checking in! No AI was used to create those articles. I wrote them locally over the course of the election and published them together afterward once I got to a good point, which is why so many appeared in such a short window. The bulk of the work on the articles was done before they went live, not just within that 2.5 hour span. If you spot any problems with a specific article, please let me know and I'll be happy to take a look. QuaintCable (talk) 18:20, 5 November 2026 (UTC)
- The articles are fairly formulaic which is typical for newly elected politicians so this seems like reasonable explanation to me. S0091 (talk) 18:29, 5 November 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for your quick response, QuaintCable and for weighing in, S0091. No further questions from me. --Rosiestep (talk) 13:35, 6 November 2026 (UTC)
- The articles are fairly formulaic which is typical for newly elected politicians so this seems like reasonable explanation to me. S0091 (talk) 18:29, 5 November 2026 (UTC)