User talk:TPI81AF

Hello, TPI81AF. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ensighten, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:08, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Wakouwa. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. • Quinn (talk • it/its) 03:12, 5 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Vyupaq (talk) 12:34, 16 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of candies, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barratt was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hey there! First, thanks for all your good work. Second, from the perspective of WikiProject Spaceflight, almost no article related to Star Trek has any significance to the wikiproject. Is there a way to filter the deletion sorting for this? Thanks! (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 19:39, 10 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about that. I wasn't sure which deletion sorting categories they belonged in so I added them to spaceflight when I should have added them to science fiction and fantasy, as I just now discovered. TPI81AF (talk) 21:18, 10 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, how are you? I know you nominated some episode articles of The Simpsons for redirecting, and I agree that a lot of them aren’t worthy of an article, but I’m just noting that I’m currently going through season 36 and 37 to try and make those articles better, even making some of them Good Articles (which I’ve done for 2 episodes so far), so I ask that you allow me time to work on season 36 and 37 if you also plan on nominating the episodes from those seasons for redirecting Crystal Drawers 🎖️ ^{(wanna talk?)} 14:33, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Duly noted. I likely won't get to those for a while, but I will check with you before redirecting/merging articles from those seasons. TPI81AF (talk) 18:53, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toss the Turtle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toss the Turtle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

VRXCES (talk) 06:10, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Gigazine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

~ A412 ^talk! 15:48, 25 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Toss the Turtle.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Gigazine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Absurdum4242 (talk) 13:25, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Why you delete puzza list??? You be menstruating???

An article you recently created, List of Breakout clones, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 01:28, 18 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to List of bubble tea chains. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 16:38, 26 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

???? This is an incredibly bizarre edit, all of the species have articles, and you chose to redirect them to the main genus, along with incorrectly capitalizing them. If you're going to be making shoddy edits like this, you have no business editing templates at all. Hemiauchenia (talk) 16:35, 23 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

I’ve noticed you deleted redlinks from Template:Chondrichthyan genera and Template:Pantodonta, among other templates, on the basis of WP:EXISTING. However, that guideline only recommends removing redlinks unless “they are very likely to be developed into articles that satisfy the general notability guideline or one of the subject-specific notability guidelines”, with WP:NSPECIES establishing that all genera of eukaryotes are already notable by default (and therefore making this section of WP:EXISTING moot). Furthermore, redlinks “can be retained in navigation templates that represent a well-defined and complete set of data (geographic divisions, annual events, etc.), where deleting red links would leave an incomplete and misleading result”. As lists of genera within a taxonomic group constitute “well-defined and complete sets of data”, removing redlinks from them would also be against this section of the guideline, in addition to the section relating to notability. IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 16:43, 23 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

The likelihood of a page being created is independent of the subject's notability. There is still no indication that any of those pages will ever materialize. The purpose of the navigational boxes is as a navigational aid, which a superabundance of red links directly inhibits. There are already list articles for those wanting a complete catalogue. If you don't mind, I would like to move this conversation over to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biology. TPI81AF (talk) 15:18, 26 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Let's move it over to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Paleontology instead, since Paleontology is the Wikiproject which has the most to lose from the removal of navbox redlinks. In my experience, the near-universal (albeit unspoken) standard in WP Paleo is to treat prehistoric genera navboxes as exhaustive lists with hierarchical categorization and easy links to related pages. Redlinks invite article creation, and their removal inhibits that useful role. Separate list articles are fine in some circumstances, though they reduce discoverability substantially (the example you gave has only 4 views in the past month), while a navbox is visible and convenient on every page with its subject matter. In addition, I believe removing redlinks would give readers an inaccurate perception that some groups (for example, Pantodonta) were less diverse than in reality. NGPezz (talk) 15:48, 26 October 2026 (UTC)Reply