Jump to content

User talk:Toometa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 days ago by Sulfurboy in topic Marcos Zentilli moved to draftspace

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Toometa! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 15:35, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Atemoot

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Toometa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Atemoot, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Gresham, a London-based finance company.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Gresham, a London-based finance company.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 23 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boozt (August 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Contains references with "source=chatgpt.com" in the URL. I have made no judgement on the rest of the draft content, but since ChatGPT has been used in the creation of this draft you must read WP:LLM and carefully review all the content of the draft to check for hallucinations, unsubstantiated text, non-existent references. If you are sure that no ChatGPT artefacts remain, you can re-submit this draft for review.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
qcne (talk) 20:54, 28 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Toometa! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 20:54, 28 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ambiq Micro, Inc has been accepted

[edit]
Ambiq Micro, Inc, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 21:01, 2 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Ambiq Micro, an American semiconductor company.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Ambiq Micro, an American semiconductor company.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:49, 3 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boozt has been accepted

[edit]
Boozt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SnowyRiver28 (talk) 23:53, 1 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Claudia Vargas Mirza (November 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aesurias was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Aesurias (talk) 22:57, 4 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Offerpad (November 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 17:55, 14 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Gresham, a London-based finance company.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Gresham, a London-based finance company.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 2 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Offerpad

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Toometa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Offerpad, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:08, 17 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Claudia Vargas Mirza

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Toometa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Claudia Vargas Mirza, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:07, 1 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Claudia Vargas Mirza

[edit]

Hello, Toometa. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Claudia Vargas Mirza".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 23:26, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stefano Paleari has been accepted

[edit]
Stefano Paleari, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Astra Travasso (talk) 05:20, 9 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Offerpad

[edit]

Hello, Toometa. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Offerpad".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 20:25, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beauty Pie (August 7)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, M kuhner, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
The material at WP:CORPTRIV is helpful in understanding what Wikipedia considers to be routine business affairs that do not establish notability. That's all that I really see here. Bear in mind that most businesses cannot have Wikipedia pages, and it is no reflection on the quality of the business.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Beauty Pie to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

M kuhner (talk) 09:27, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Viz.ai (August 23)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Every source but one is WP:ORGTRIV and WP:CHURN

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Viz.ai to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Sulfurboy (talk) 19:21, 23 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Upsun (August 26)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Timtrent, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
You have presented a company doing WP:ROTN business things. This is not presented as having the smallest notability.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Upsun to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 07:01, 26 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: TDCX has been accepted

[edit]
TDCX, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

EvanTech10 (talk, contribs) ⚡ 02:16, 29 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beauty Pie (August 29)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Timtrent, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
You have simply described a company and what it does. None of this shows notability

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Beauty Pie to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 16:41, 29 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beauty Pie has been accepted

[edit]
Beauty Pie, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 17:23, 6 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Willy van Rooy has been accepted

[edit]
Willy van Rooy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Balabush (talk) 15:30, 14 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Upsun (October 1)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, MSK, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Upsun to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

msk 19:18, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcos Zentilli (October 16)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Bastobasto, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for academics. The draft requires either:

or multiple published secondary sources that:

  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Pretty much all of those sources are non-independent: they're by entities that gave him awards or that he was or is apart of. The article by Willick is a trivial mention.
You need independent sources. Please consult WP:N.
Also his h-index (41) falls short of him being notable per being influential in his field.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Marcos Zentilli to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Bastobasto (talk) 15:46, 16 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcos Zentilli has been accepted

[edit]
Marcos Zentilli, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ldm1954 (talk) 17:02, 17 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

October 2026

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Gurkubondinn. An edit that you recently made to User:Toometa/Aravind Srinivas seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. ‑‑gurkubondinn 14:34, 23 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

AINB notice

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:AI noticeboard/Toometa regarding your edits. ‑‑gurkubondinn 15:34, 23 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Other accounts

[edit]

Your user page says that you have been contributing to Wikipedia since 2014, but this account was created in 2022 and the other account that is linked on the user page only made a few edits in 2022. Do you have any other accounts on the English Wikipedia? ‑‑gurkubondinn 15:50, 23 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Gurkubondinn,
My previous accounts, Utilisateur:Alguill (French Wikipedia), Utilisateur:Epistus (French Wikipedia) and User:Epistus (English Wikipedia), are already listed on my user page. The reference to 2014 comes from my first contributions to the French Wikipedia under Alguill, although I was inactive for several years afterwards. I realise that the wording on my user page could give a different impression, so I'll clarify it.
I also created ProbingTheAbyss on 13 October 2026 to separate my volunteer editing from my paid work. I've only made seven edits with that account, all on the same day and in User:ProbingTheAbyss/sandbox. I hadn't yet added it to my user page, but I'll do that now.
I've also seen the discussion at the AI noticeboard. I'll respond there once I've had time to go through the edits you've raised. Toometa (talk) 16:30, 23 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for that, I wasn't sure if the user page meant that you had been actively editing the English Wikipedia since 2014 on a different account. So thanks for clearing that up. ‑‑gurkubondinn 16:33, 23 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aravind Srinivas (November 5)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate, draft, or rewrite article content.

Please delete the portions which were LLM-generated, and summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have used an LLM but you believe that your use is covered by one of the two exceptions (basic copyediting and translation between two languages in which you are fully fluent), please provide a transcript of the prompt(s) you used while writing your draft (see the how-to guide). Reviewers can make mistakes. If you have not received any LLM assistance, you may seek a second opinion at the AfC Help Desk.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Aravind Srinivas to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Sulfurboy (talk) 01:52, 5 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

Marcos Zentilli moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Marcos Zentilli. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Sulfurboy (talk) 01:57, 10 November 2026 (UTC)Reply