Jump to content

Variable-order Markov model

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the mathematical theory of stochastic processes, variable-order Markov (VOM) models are an important class of models that extend the well known Markov chain models. In contrast to the Markov chain models, where each random variable in a sequence with a Markov property depends on a fixed number of random variables, in VOM models this number of conditioning random variables may vary based on the specific observed realization.

This realization sequence is often called the context; therefore the VOM models are also called context trees.[1] VOM models are nicely rendered by colorized probabilistic suffix trees (PST).[2] The flexibility in the number of conditioning random variables turns out to be of real advantage for many applications, such as statistical analysis, classification and prediction.[3][4][5]

Example

[edit]

Consider for example a sequence of random variables, each of which takes a value from the ternary alphabet {a, b, c}. Specifically, consider the string constructed from infinite concatenations of the sub-string aaabc: aaabcaaabcaaabcaaabc…aaabc.

The VOM model of maximal order 2 can approximate the above string using only the following five conditional probability components: Pr(a | aa) = 0.5, Pr(b | aa) = 0.5, Pr(c | b) = 1.0, Pr(a | c)= 1.0, Pr(a | ca) = 1.0.

In this example, Pr(c | ab) = Pr(c | b) = 1.0; therefore, the shorter context b is sufficient to determine the next character. Similarly, the VOM model of maximal order 3 can generate the string exactly using only five conditional probability components, which are all equal to 1.0.

To construct the Markov chain of order 1 for the next character in that string, one must estimate the following 9 conditional probability components: Pr(a | a), Pr(a | b), Pr(a | c), Pr(b | a), Pr(b | b), Pr(b | c), Pr(c | a), Pr(c | b), Pr(c | c). To construct the Markov chain of order 2 for the next character, one must estimate 27 conditional probability components: Pr(a | aa), Pr(a | ab), …, Pr(c | cc). And to construct the Markov chain of order three for the next character one must estimate the following 81 conditional probability components: Pr(a | aaa), Pr(a | aab), …, Pr(c | ccc).

In practical settings there is seldom sufficient data to accurately estimate the exponentially increasing number of conditional probability components as the order of the Markov chain increases.

The variable-order Markov model assumes that in realistic settings, there are certain realizations of states (represented by contexts) in which some past states are independent from the future states; accordingly, "a great reduction in the number of model parameters can be achieved."[1]

Definition

[edit]

Let A be a state space (finite alphabet) of size |A|.

Consider a sequence with the Markov property x1n=x1x2…xn of n realizations of random variables, where xi∈A is the state (symbol) at position i (1≤i≤n), and the concatenation of states xi and xi+1 is denoted by xixi+1.

Given a training set of observed states, x1n, the construction algorithm of the VOM models[3][4][5] learns a model P that provides a probability assignment for each state in the sequence given its past (previously observed symbols) or future states.

Specifically, the learner generates a conditional probability distribution P(xi∣s) for a symbol xi∈A given a context s∈A∗, where the * sign represents a sequence of states of any length, including the empty context.

VOM models attempt to estimate conditional distributions of the form P(xi∣s) where the context length |s|≤D varies depending on the available statistics. In contrast, conventional Markov models attempt to estimate these conditional distributions by assuming a fixed contexts' length |s|=D and, hence, can be considered as special cases of the VOM models.

Effectively, for a given training sequence, the VOM models are found to obtain better model parameterization than the fixed-order Markov models that leads to a better variance-bias tradeoff of the learned models.[3][4][5]

Application areas

[edit]

Various efficient algorithms have been devised for estimating the parameters of the VOM model.[4]

VOM models have been successfully applied to areas such as machine learning, information theory and bioinformatics, including specific applications such as coding and data compression,[1] document compression,[4] classification and identification of DNA and protein sequences,[6] [3] statistical process control,[5] spam filtering,[7] haplotyping,[8] speech recognition,[9] sequence analysis in social sciences,[2] and others.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 3 Rissanen, J. (Sep 1983). "A Universal Data Compression System". IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 29 (5): 656–664. doi:10.1109/TIT.1983.1056741.
  2. 1 2 Gabadinho, Alexis; Ritschard, Gilbert (2016). "Analyzing State Sequences with Probabilistic Suffix Trees: The PST R Package". Journal of Statistical Software. 72 (3). doi:10.18637/jss.v072.i03. ISSN 1548-7660. S2CID 63681202.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Shmilovici, A.; Ben-Gal, I. (2007). "Using a VOM Model for Reconstructing Potential Coding Regions in EST Sequences". Computational Statistics. 22 (1): 49–69. doi:10.1007/s00180-007-0021-8. S2CID 2737235.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Begleiter, R.; El-Yaniv, R.; Yona, G. (2004). "On Prediction Using Variable Order Markov models". Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 22: 385–421. arXiv:1107.0051. doi:10.1613/jair.1491.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Ben-Gal, I.; Morag, G.; Shmilovici, A. (2003). "Context-Based Statistical Process Control: A Monitoring Procedure for State-Dependent Processes" (PDF). Technometrics. 45 (4): 293–311. doi:10.1198/004017003000000122. ISSN 0040-1706. S2CID 5227793.
  6. ↑ Grau J.; Ben-Gal I.; Posch S.; Grosse I. (2006). "VOMBAT: Prediction of Transcription Factor Binding Sites using Variable Order Bayesian Trees" (PDF). Nucleic Acids Research. 34 (Web Server issue). Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 34, issue W529–W533.: W529-33. doi:10.1093/nar/gkl212. PMC 1538886. PMID 16845064. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2018-09-30. Retrieved 2014-01-10.
  7. ↑ Bratko, A.; Cormack, G. V.; Filipic, B.; Lynam, T.; Zupan, B. (2006). "Spam Filtering Using Statistical Data Compression Models" (PDF). Journal of Machine Learning Research. 7: 2673–2698.
  8. ↑ Browning, Sharon R. "Multilocus association mapping using variable-length Markov chains." The American Journal of Human Genetics 78.6 (2006): 903–913.
  9. ↑ Smith, A.; Denenberg, J.; Slack, T.; Tan, C.; Wohlford, R. (1985). "Application of a sequential pattern learning system to connected speech recognition". ICASSP '85. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Vol. 10. Tampa, FL, USA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. pp. 1201–1204. doi:10.1109/ICASSP.1985.1168282. S2CID 60991068.