Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2013/User:John Bot II/Status
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to 
Keep. Speedily closing, clearly inappropriate request. Mh7kJ (talk) 17:29, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
User:John Bot II/Status
[change source]Aaqib has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: It is not updated. Useless and the bot is not even active. Aaqib Talk!| Hola! 17:16, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
[change source]
Comment: I am actually nominating this for deletion. --Aaqib Talk!| Hola! 17:17, 14 June 2013 (UTC)- Keep This is a user subpage and is part of the operation of this bot when operational. It is not an article so doesn't all under WP:NOTABILITY. There is no reason to delete. -DJSasso (talk) 17:16, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Disagree the bot is not even active, just a silly page and proving that Wikipedia is supposed to be reliable. So I bet John Bot II's bot flag has been revoked. --Aaqib Talk!| Hola! 17:19, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter that it isn't active. People can put anything in their user space they want as long as it relates to working on the wiki which this stuff does. We don't delete the userpages of people who have become inactive. Again this is a user page not an article page so has nothing to do with wikipedia's reliability. I suggest you better get more knowledgeable with Wikipedia's policies. -DJSasso (talk) 17:21, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- Disagree We are not even deleting a userpage! --Aaqib Talk!| Hola! 17:23, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- Do you see the User: at the beginning of the name? That means it is a userpage. -DJSasso (talk) 17:24, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, preferably speedy keep for lack of an actual policy-based rationale. It's just a userpage with userpage things in it. Causing no harm whatsoever. Osiris (talk) 17:27, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- Disagree It is false! --Aaqib Talk!| Hola! 17:29, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Checking... I am reading the Deletion policies. --Aaqib Talk!| Hola! 17:29, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 17:16, 21 June 2013 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.