User talk:Rogerthat

The redirect Southern Districts has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 May 18 § Southern Districts until a consensus is reached. Servite et contribuere (talk) 07:38, 18 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

The article Kate Anderson-Richardson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to find significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, and my research only provided passing mentions for a previous record.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 13:25, 14 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kate Anderson-Richardson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Anderson-Richardson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 14:15, 14 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

The article Half-forward line has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references since 2009, and article subject is already well covered at Australian rules football positions#Half-forward line, so no need for a standalone duplicate to exist.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nil🥝^Talk 02:17, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 19 § some v2 redirects to have fun with until a consensus is reached. consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 18:35, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply